Table 1, Types of selective outcome and analysis reporting, which may affect the direction and/or magnitude of the reported study findings

Howard Balshem; Adrienne Stevens; Mohammed Ansari; Susan L. Norris; Devan Kansagara; Tatyana Shamliyan; Roger Chou; Mei Chung; David Moher; Kay Dickersin

Related publications

Article2013

Figure 1, Flow diagram of the risk of outcome reporting bias and analysis reporting bias assessment process

Howard Balshem, Adrienne Stevens, Mohammed Tahir Ansari, Susan L. Norris, Devan Kansagara, Tatyana Shamliyan, Roger Chou, Mei Chung, David Moher, Kay Dickersin

Article2021

Association between Self-Reported Gluten Avoidance and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Findings of the NutriNet-Santé Study

Anouk Reuzé, Rosalie Delvert, Laëtitia Perrin, Robert Benamouzig, Jean‐Marc Sabaté, Michel Bouchoucha, Benjamin Allès, Mathilde Touvier, Serge Hercberg, Chantal Julia, Emmanuelle Kesse‐Guyot

Article2008

Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

Kerry Dwan, Douglas G. Altman, Juan A. Arnaiz, Jill Bloom, An‐Wen Chan, Eugenia Cronin, Évelyne Decullier, Philippa Easterbrook, Erik von Elm, Carrol Gamble, Davina Ghersi, John P A Ioannidis, John Simes, Paula Williamson

Article2013

[Table, Finding Grey Literature Evidence and Assessing for Outcome and Analysis Reporting Biases When Comparing Medical Interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program].

Howard Balshem, Adrienne Stevens, Mohammed Tahir Ansari, Susan L. Norris, Devan Kansagara, Tatyana Shamliyan, Roger Chou, Mei Chung, David Moher, Kay Dickersin

Article2002

Task Force #1—magnitude of the prevention problem: opportunities and challenges

Emelia Benjamin, Sidney C. Smith, Richard Cooper, Michael D. Hill, Russell V. Luepker