With the resurgence of drugs with covalent binding mechanisms, much attention has been paid to docking methods for the discovery of targeted covalent inhibitors. The existence of many available covalent docking tools has inspired development of a systematic and objective procedure and criteria with which to evaluate these programs. In order to find a tool appropriate to studies of a covalently binding system, protocols and criteria are proposed for protein-ligand covalent docking studies. This paper consists of three sections: (1) curating a standard data set to evaluate covalent docking tools objectively; (2) establishing criteria to measure the performance of a tool applied for docking ligands into a complex system; and (3) creating a protocol to evaluate and select covalent binding tools. The protocols were applied to evaluate four covalent docking tools (MOE, GOLD, CovDock, and ICM-Pro) and parameters affecting covalent docking performance were investigated.
Daniel L. King, Samuel R. Chamberlain, Natacha Carragher, Joël Billieux, Dan Joseph Stein, Kai Mueller, Marc N. Potenza, Hans‐Jürgen Rumpf, John B. Saunders, Vladan Starčević, Zsolt Demetrovics, Matthias Brand, Hae Kook Lee, Marcantonio M. Spada, Katajun Lindenberg, Anise M. S. Wu, Tagrid Leménager, Ståle Pallesen, Sophia Achab, Michael Kyrios, Susumu Higuchi, Naomi Fineberg, Paul Delfabbro
Maria José Alves, Hugo J.C. Froufe, Ana F T Costa, Anabela F Santos, Liliana G Oliveira, Sara R M Osório, Rui M.V. Abreu, Manuela Pintado, Isabel Cristina Fernandes Rodrigues Ferreira
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.