SURVEY ON OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT DAILY PRACTICE IN THE HYPERTENSIVE CENTERS OF THE ITALIAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION — Francesca Saladini (2025) | RDL Network
SURVEY ON OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT DAILY PRACTICE IN THE HYPERTENSIVE CENTERS OF THE ITALIAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION
Article 2025 en
Authors
FS
Francesca Saladini
FA
F Albini
AG
Antonino Di Guardo
Abstract
2 min read
Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate daily clinical pratice for office blood pressure (BP) measurement among the centers of the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA). Design and method: The working group on ambulatory BP monitoring of SIIA developed an online questionnaire on daily clinical practise for office BP measurement. The questionnaire consisted of 26 questions regarding equipment available for BP detection in office, the procedure followed to detect it, usual practise followed to confirm the diagnosis of office hypertension. The survey was spread by an e-mail with a direct link to the questionnaire on a web platform. Results: We obtained 72 answers (rate response 60.5%). 95.6% stated the use of a validated device: 65.3% used an automatic oscillometric device, almost one third (27.8%) an aneroid device, while 6.9% used a manual device with a digital column. The majority of the offices had standard and large cuffs, while only half had small and extra large cuffs. In 70.4% of the centers BP was measured by the physicians at the time of the visit, in 15.5% by a nurse, before the entrance of the physician, in 12.7% again by the nurse but in the presence of the doctor, only 1.4% performed unattended measurements. The majority tested BP in two different positions supine or sitting and standing positions, but there was a quarter of centers that detected BP only in one position. Less than half performed 3 BP measurements, the majority performed one or two detections and less than 20% performed 3 measurements only in case of disagreement between the first and second one. To confirm the diagnosis of office hypertension the majority suggested home (40.3%) or ambulatory (30.6%) BP, 25.0% performed a tailored decision, 2.7% planned a new office BP evaluation, while 1.4% confirmed the diagnosis at the first assessment. Conclusions: Despite a correct office BP measurement is mandatory to detect hypertesion, as clearly indicated by guidelines, our results highlighted an eterogenous condition through the Italian territory
Dragana Radovanović, Renate Schoenenberger-Berzins, Franco Muggli, Augusto Gallino, Gianfranco Parati, Paolo M. Suter, Mario G. Bianchetti, Paul Erné, Andreas W. Schoenenberger
Raúl Villar, Ramiro Sánchez, José Boggia, Ernesto Peñaherrera, Jesús Lopez, Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso, Eduardo Costa Duarte Barbosa, Leonardo Cobos, Rafael Hernández Hernández, José Octavio, José Z Parra Carrillo, Agustín J. Ramiréz, Gianfranco Parati
Bojan Jelaković, Αreti Triantafyllou, Michael Doumas, Rigas Kalaitzidis, Athanase D. Protogerou, Emmanouil Kallistratos, George S. Stergiou, Alessandro Moloberti, Cristina Giannattasio, Maria Marketou, John A. Papadakis, D. Papadopoulos, Martino F. Pengo, Gianfranco Parati, Pantelis Sarafidis, Vesna Stojanov, Eleni Triantafyllidi, Eleni Manta, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Enrico Agabiti‐Rosei, Reinhold Kreutz, ,
María T. Ríos, Manuel Domínguez-Sardiña, Diana E. Ayala, Sonia M. Gomara, Elvira Sineiro, Lorenzo Pousa, Pedro A. Callejas, M. J. Fontao, José R. Fernández, Ramon C Hermida
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.