Survey of the Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation
Article 2013 en
Authors
SG
Silvia Gianola
MG
Monica Gasparini
MA
Michela Agostini
Abstract
1 min read
This sample of SRs in the rehabilitation field showed heterogeneous characteristics and a moderate quality of reporting. Poor control of potential source of bias might be improved if more widely agreed-upon evidence-based reporting guidelines will be actively endorsed and adhered to by authors and journals.
Rafael Sarkis‐Onofre, Tatiana Pereira‐Cenci, Rafaela Bassani, Matthew J. Page, Andrea C. Tricco, David Moher, Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira
Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Raju Kanukula, Joanne E. McKenzie, Zainab Alqaidoom, Sue Brennan, Neal Haddaway, Daniel G. Hamilton, Sathya Karunananthan, Steve McDonald, David Moher, Shinichi Nakagawa, David Nunan, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Matthew J. Page
Victoria Hunniford, Joshua Montroy, Dean Fergusson, Marc T. Avey, Kimberley E. Wever, Sarah McCann, Madison Foster, Grace Fox, Mackenzie Lafreniere, Mira Ghaly, Sydney Mannell, Karolina Godwinska, Avonae Gentles, Shehab Selim, Jenna MacNeil, Lindsey Sikora, Emily S. Sena, Matthew J. Page, Malcolm Macleod, David Moher, Manoj M. Lalu
Kusala Pussegoda, Lucy Turner, Chantelle Garritty, Alain Mayhew, Becky Skidmore, Adrienne Stevens, Isabelle Boutron, Rafael Sarkis‐Onofre, Lise M. Bjerre, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Douglas G. Altman, David Moher
.webp){kind=small}
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.