Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects

Tiago Pereira; John P A Ioannidis

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.012

Back

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2005

Clinical trials in urology: how many patients are required to achieve statistically significant results?

Fabio Parazzini, Enrico Colli, Liliane Chatenoud, Matteo Malvezzi, Lorenza Olivieri, Francesco Montorsi, Carlo La Vecchia

Article2020

Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses

Stefan Schandelmaier, Matthias Briel, Ravi Varadhan, Christopher H. Schmid, Niveditha Devasenapathy, Rodney A. Hayward, Joel Gagnier, Michael Borenstein, Geert J. M. G. van der Heijden, Issa J Dahabreh, Xin Sun, Willi Sauerbrei, Michael Walsh, John P A Ioannidis, Lehana Thabane, Gordon H. Guyatt

Letter1998

Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?

John P A Ioannidis, Joseph Lau

Article2018

Marginal structural models and other analyses allow multiple estimates of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials: Meta-epidemiological analysis

Hannah Ewald, Benjamin Speich, Aviv Ladanie, Heiner C. Bucher, John P A Ioannidis, Lars G. Hemkens

Letter1998

Meta-Analyses and Large Randomized, Controlled Trials

John P A Ioannidis, Joseph C. Cappelleri, Joseph T. F. Lau