Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ecosystem
Switch app
TR
About
FAQ
Sign in
Get started
Response to commentary: Spurious meta-analyses: both critical methodological assessment and statistical correction are needed — Georgia Salanti (2009) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Response to commentary: Spurious meta-analyses: both critical methodological assessment and statistical correction are needed
Shared by
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Response to commentary: Spurious meta-analyses: both critical methodological assessment and statistical correction are needed
Article
2009
en
Authors
GS
Georgia Salanti
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Letter
2011
Commentary: Adjusting for bias: a user's guide to performing plastic surgery on meta-analyses of observational studies
John P A Ioannidis
Editorial Material
2018
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure
Morten Hylander Møller
,
John P A Ioannidis
,
Michaël Darmon
Letter
2021
Commentary: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 Statement: What Neurosurgeons Should Know
Nathan A. Shlobin
,
David Moher
Corrigendum
2018
Correction to: Industry-funded versus non-profit-funded critical care research: a meta-epidemiological overview
Perrine Janiaud
,
Ioana A. Cristea
,
John P A Ioannidis
Article
2017
Body mass index and 20 specific cancers: re-analyses of dose–response meta-analyses of observational studies
Eun Kyoung Choi
,
H.B. Park
,
Keum Hwa Lee
,
Jung-Won Park
,
Michael Eisenhut
,
G. Kim
,
Jae Il Shin
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.