Reply to Roberts et al.: CHEERS is Sufficient for Reporting Cost-Benefit Analysis, but May Require Further Elaboration

Don Husereau; Michael Drummond; Stavros Petrou; Dan Greenberg; Josephine Mauskopf; Federico Augustovski; Andrew Briggs; David Moher; Elizabeth Loder; Chris Carswell

doi:10.1007/s40273-015-0277-8

Back

Reply to Roberts et al.: CHEERS is Sufficient for Reporting Cost-Benefit Analysis, but May Require Further Elaboration

Letter 2015 en

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Letter2005

Reply to Badri et al. on ‘Limited benefit of antiretroviral resistance testing in treatment-experienced patients: a meta-analysis’

Thomas A Trikalinos, Ermioni T Panidou, John P A Ioannidis

Letter2019

Reply to Nathamgari et al.: Nanopore electroporation for intracellular delivery of biological macromolecules

Yuhong Cao, Enbo Ma, Stefano Cestellos-Blanco, Ruoyi Qiu, Yude Su, Jennifer A. Doudna, Peidong Yang

Article2022

Reply to Simpson et al.: Short-term no tillage reduces soil carbon stocks but longer duration can alleviate the initial decline

Andong Cai, Tianfu Han, Tianjing Ren, Jonathan Sanderman, Yichao Rui, Bin Wang, Pete Smith, Minggang Xu, Yue Li

Letter2013

Reply to Leifeld et al.: Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming is not equated with climate change mitigation

Andreas Gattinger, Adrian Müller, Matthias Haeni, Colin Skinner, Andreas Fließbach, Nina Buchmann, Paul Mäder, Matthias Stolze, Pete Smith, Nadia El‐Hage Scialabba, U. Niggli

Article2014

Reply to X. Qi et al ' Brivanib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Trials: Selection Bias From Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage?'

Josep M. Llovet, Philip J. Johnson