Relationship between baseline hepatic status and outcome, and effect of sorafenib on liver function: SHARP trial subanalyses — Jean‐Luc Raoul (2012) | RDL Network
Relationship between baseline hepatic status and outcome, and effect of sorafenib on liver function: SHARP trial subanalyses
Journal of Hepatology 56(5): 1080-1088
Article 2012 English
Authors
JR
Jean‐Luc Raoul
JB
Jordi Bruix
TG
Tim F. Greten
Abstract
1 min read
Background & Aims
Hepatic markers are utilized in many classification systems of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and, by measuring organ damage and tumor stage, can influence treatment. Moreover, elevated serum concentrations of aminotransferases and alpha-fetoprotein are indicators of poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We examined the effects of sorafenib on hepatic markers by performing exploratory subset analyses of the Sorafenib HCC Assessment Randomized Protocol (SHARP) trial in patients categorized by baseline concentrations of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase, alpha-fetoprotein, and bilirubin; and by evaluating the effects of sorafenib on bilirubin concentrations during treatment.
Methods
Patients (n=602) were grouped by baseline concentrations of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (not significantly elevated, mildly elevated, or moderately elevated), alpha-fetoprotein (normal or elevated), and bilirubin (normal or elevated). Bilirubin was measured at baseline and on day 1 of each cycle.
Results
Patients with elevated baseline concentrations of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase, alpha-fetoprotein, or bilirubin had shorter overall survival (OS) than those with normal baseline concentrations, irrespective of treatment group. No notable differences in safety profiles were observed between patients with normal vs. elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase, alpha-fetoprotein, or bilirubin. Median changes from baseline in bilirubin concentration at the last cycle of treatment were +0.17 and +0.19mg/dl in the sorafenib and placebo groups, respectively.
Conclusions
These subset analyses suggest that sorafenib is safe and effective for hepatocellular carcinoma, irrespective of baseline alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase, alpha-fetoprotein, or bilirubin concentration and that hepatic function remains stable over the course of sorafenib therapy.
Jordi Bruix, Jean‐Luc Raoul, Morris Sherman, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Luigi Bolondi, Antonio Craxı̀, Peter R. Galle, Armando Santoro, Michel Beaugrand, Angelo Sangiovanni, Camillo Porta, Guido Gerken, Jorge A. Marrero, Andrea Nadel, Michael Shan, M. Moscovici, D. Voliotis, Josep M. Llovet
Andrew X. Zhu, Yoon‐Koo Kang, Chia‐Jui Yen, Richard S. Finn, Peter R. Galle, Josep M. Llovet, Éric Assenat, Giovanni Brandi, Marc Pracht, Ho Yeong Lim, Kun‐Ming Rau, Kenta Motomura, Izumi Ohno, Philippe Merle, Bruno Daniele, Dong Bok Shin, Guido Gerken, Christophe Borg, Jean‐Baptiste Hiriart, Takuji Okusaka, Manabu Morimoto,
Arndt Vogel, Catherine Frenette, Max W. Sung, Bruno Daniele, Ari David Baron, Stephen L. Chan, Jean Frédéric Blanc, Toshiyuki Tamai, Min Ren, Howard J. Lim, Daniel H. Palmer, Yuko Takami, Masatoshi Kudo
Masatoshi Kudo, Peter R. Galle, Giovanni Brandi, Yoon‐Koo Kang, Chia-Jui Yen, Richard S. Finn, Josep M. Llovet, Éric Assenat, Philippe Merle, Stephen L. Chan, Daniel H. Palmer, Masafumi Ikeda, Tatsuya Yamashita, Arndt Vogel, Yi‐Hsiang Huang, Paolo Abada, Reigetsu Yoshikawa, Kenta Shinozaki, Chunxiao Wang, Ryan C. Widau, Andrew X. Zhu
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.