Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ecosystem
Switch app
TR
About
FAQ
Sign in
Get started
Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology — Matthew K. Sigurdson (2020) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology
Shared by
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology
Article
2020
en
Authors
MS
Matthew K. Sigurdson
MK
Muin J. Khoury
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Article
2020
Data for: Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology
Matthew K. Sigurdson
,
John P A Ioannidis
,
Muin J. Khoury
Editorial Material
2014
Editorial: Updated Guidance on Human Genome Epidemiology (HuGE) Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Genetic Associations
Marta Gwinn
,
John P A Ioannidis
,
Julian Little
,
Muin J. Khoury
Article
2016
The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses
John P A Ioannidis
Article
2002
Commentary: Meta-analysis of Individual Participants' Data in Genetic Epidemiology
John P A Ioannidis
Article
2003
Identifying null meta-analyses that are ripe for updating
Nicholas Barrowman
,
Manchun Fang
,
Margaret Sampson
,
David Moher
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.