Re-rethinking the article by Thombs and colleagues: Figure 1:
Article 2012 en
Authors
BT
Brett D. Thombs
JC
James C. Coyne
PC
Pim Cuijpers
Abstract
1 min read
Linden and Vodermaier[1][1] claim that the rate of false-positives with screening for depression is “very acceptable.” Whether a false-positive rate is acceptable depends on the prevalence of disease in the population being screened. Given the prevalence of depression in a typical primary care
Igor Codreanu, Vera Sali, Sergiu Gaibu, Luminița Suveică, Serghei Popa, Norberto Perico, Bogdan Ene‐Iordache, Sergio Carminati, John Feehally, Giuseppe Remuzzi
Kimberly Nurse, Magdalena Janus, Catherine S. Birken, Charles Keown‐Stoneman, Jessica Omand, Jonathon L. Maguire, Caroline Reid‐Westoby, Eric Duku, Gerald Lebovic, Muhammad Mamdani, Janis Randall Simpson, Mark S. Tremblay, Patricia C. Parkin, Cory Borkhoff
Dominic Oliver, Maite Arribas, Joaquim Raduà, Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Andrea De Micheli, Giulia Spada, Martina Maria Mensi, Magdalena Kotlicka‐Antczak, Renato Borgatti, Marco Solmi, Jae Il Shin, Scott W. Woods, Jean Addington, Philip McGuire, Paolo Fusar‐Poli
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.