Quantitative flow ratio–guided strategy versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the FAVOR III China trial — Lei Song (2020) | RDL Network
Quantitative flow ratio–guided strategy versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the FAVOR III China trial
American Heart Journal 223: 72-80
Article 2020 English
Authors
LS
Lei Song
ST
Shengxian Tu
ZS
Zhongwei Sun
Abstract
1 min read
Background
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel angiography-based approach enabling fast computation of fractional flow reserve without use of pressure wire or adenosine. The objective of this investigator-initiated, multicenter, patient- and clinical assessor-blinded randomized trial is to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a QFR-augmented angiography-guided (QFR-guided) strategy versus an angiography-only guided (angiography-guided) strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease.
Methods
Approximately 3,830 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a QFR-guided or an angiography-guided strategy. Included subjects scheduled for coronary angiography have at least 1 lesion eligible for PCI with 50%-90% stenosis in an artery with ≥2.5 mm reference diameter. Subjects assigned to the QFR-guided strategy will have QFR measured in each interrogated vessel and undergo PCI when QFR ≤0.80, with deferral for lesions with QFR >0.80. Those assigned to the angiography-guided strategy will undergo PCI based on angiography. Optimal medical therapy will be administered to all treated and deferred patients. The primary end point is the 1-year rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, or any ischemia-driven revascularization. The major secondary end point is 1-year MACE excluding periprocedural myocardial infarction. Other secondary end points include the individual components of MACE and cost-effectiveness end points. The sample size affords 85% power to demonstrate superiority of QFR guidance compared with angiography guidance.
Conclusions
The FAVOR III China study will be the first randomized trial to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a QFR-guided versus an angiography-guided PCI strategy in coronary artery disease patients.
Bo Xu, Shengxian Tu, Lei Song, Zening Jin, Bo Yu, Guosheng Fu, Yujie Zhou, Jianan Wang, Yundai Chen, Jun Pu, Lianglong Chen, Xinkai Qu, Junqing Yang, Xuebo Liu, Lijun Guo, Chengxing Shen, Yao‐Jun Zhang, Qi Zhang, Hongwei Pan, Xiaogang Fu, Jian Liu, Yanyan Zhao, Javier Escaned, Yang Wang, William F. Fearon, Kefei Dou, Ajay J. Kirtane, Yongjian Wu, Patrick W. Serruys, Weixian Yang, William Wijns, Changdong Guan, Martin B. Leon, Shubin Qiao, Gregg W. Stone
Elizabeth A. Magnuson, Khaja Chinnakondepalli, Katherine Vilain, Patrick W. Serruys, Joseph F. Sabik, A. Pieter Kappetein, Gregg W. Stone, David J. Cohen
Bei Wang, Tzung‐Yi Tsai, X Q Hery, Nozomi Kotoku, Sumit Garg, Kai Ninomiya, Shigetaka Kageyama, Shinichiro Masuda, Pruthvi C. Revaiah, Johan Reiber, Carlos Collet, J A V I E R Escaned, Simone Biscaglia, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick W. Serruys
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.