Quantifying Frailty Requires a Conceptual Model Before a Statistical Model—Reply

Sidney Le; Jean Louis Vincent; Elizabeth M. Cespedes Feliciano

doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3113

Abstract

1 min read

In Reply We appreciate the letter from Reitz et al in response to our original JAMA Surgery research study.1 Several points regarding frailty measurement and the evaluation of frailty metrics warrant clarification and emphasis.

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2005

Coronary stenting in small vessels: reply

Pierfrancesco Agostoni, Giuseppe Biondi‐Zoccai, Gabriele Gasparini, Maurizio Anselmi, Giorgio Morando, Marco Turri, Antonio Abbate, Eugène McFadden, Corrado Vassanelli, Piero Zardini, Antonio Colombo, Patrick W. Serruys

European Heart Journal

Article2011

Reply to C.A. Hutchison et al

Meletios A Dimopoulos, Evangelos Terpos

Letter2015

Response to letter, ‘Immortal time bias in retrospective analysis’

Meletios A Dimopoulos, Arlene S. Swern, J S Li, M. A. Hussein, Lilia Weiss, Yasir M. Nagarwala, Rachid Baz

Letter2025

Letter: Enhancing Risk‐Adapted Colorectal Cancer Screening for People With Diabetes—Authors' Reply

Teresa Seum, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner

Article2012

Reply to the Discussion of “Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms sedentary and sedentary behaviours” — Sitting and reclining are different states

Mark S. Tremblay

Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism