Predicting Survival in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Preprint 2020 en
Authors
NM
Nuccia Morici
GV
Giovanna Viola
LA
Laura Antolini
Abstract
2 min read
Abstract Background : Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) has unique pathophysiological background requiring specific patient stratification, management and therapeutic targets. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to derive a simple stratification tool to predict survival in patients with ADHF complicated by CS. Methods and results : We analyzed data from a historic cohort of 87 ADHF-CS consecutive patients, eligible to heart replacement therapy (HRT), enrolled between 2015 and 2019. The association between selected independent variables (age, lactates and creatinine, ALC-shock score) and 28-day overall mortality was investigated through a multivariable logistic model. Predictive validity was assessed throughout an internal and external validation and compared to the Cardshock score. A nomogram was developed for predicting 28-day mortality. Overall 28-day mortality was 34%. Among patients who survived, 38 (67%) were treated with HRT: heart transplantation was performed in 68%, the remaining received an LVAD. The ALC-shock score showed better discrimination (Area Under the Curve-AUC- 0.82; 95% CI 0.73-0.91) as compared to the Cardshock score (AUC 0.67; 95% CI 0.55-0.79) (p = 0.009) to predict 28-days overall mortality. In the validation cohort the AUC for the ALC-shock score was 0.66. Conclusions : A model including age, lactates and creatinine on admission (ALC-Shock score) could be considered to predict short-term mortality in CS-ADHF patients in order to drive towards a treatment intensification. Disclosures: Dr. Garan is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant No. KL2TR001874 and has received honoraria from Abiomed. Dr. Colombo reports institutional grant support from Abbott Vascular. None of the listed entities has had any involvement with the development of the manuscript. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. Research ethics: This study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Milano Area 3 of the ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano (reference number: 543-23092020).
Nuccia Morici, Giovanna Viola, Laura Antolini, Gianfranco Alicandro, Michela Dal Martello, Alice Sacco, Maurizio Bottiroli, Federico Pappalardo, Luca Villanova, Laura Ponti, Carlo La Vecchia, Maria Frigerio, Fabrizio Oliva, J. Fried, P.C. Colombo, A.R. Garan
Milena Soriano Marcolino, Cihan Şimşek, Sanneke P.M. de Boer, Ron T. van Domburg, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Peter de Jaegere, K. Martijn Akkerhuis, Joost Daemen, Patrick W. Serruys, Eric Boersma
Christian Basile, Fabrizio Oliva, Francesco Orso, M. Cipriani, F Colivicchi, Andrea Di Lenarda, Domenico Gabrielli, Mauro Gori, Massimo Iacoviello, Marco Marini, Marco Gorini, Donata Lucci, Aldo Maggioni
Jameela Bahar, Amna Rahman, Grace W. Y. Wong, Rajiv Sankaranarayanan, Fozia Ahmed, Rebecca C. Taylor, Ahmet Fuat, Iain Squire, John G.F. Cleland, Professor Gregory Lip, James Gamble, Sundas Tahir Masudi, Prince Josiah Joseph, Kenneth Wong
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.