Preclinical assessment of transcatheter-delivered expandable endoluminal polymeric graft fabricated by electrospinning of microfiber

Background Matrix fabricated from electrospinning of micro fibre of polyester is porous and permeable to blood, facilitates cell infiltration and late resorption of the biodegradable material. This biomaterial opens an avenue of research in recreating a novel and favourable endoluminal lining in diseased vessel. Previous preclinical work has shown that implants in aorta of rodents generate layers of endoluminal elastin. In humans, one of the most impervious arteries to atherosclerosis is the intra-thoracic artery; therefore, an attempt to induce similar structures with an implantable device was made. Methods For this study, novel tissue-engineered vascular grafts (T-TEVGs) were used in a preclinical rabbit iliac artery model. It was made of resorbable polyester biomaterial processed into fibrous tubular conduits. These T-TEVGs were implanted percutaneously. In total, twelve T-TEVGs in iliac arteries of nine rabbits were implanted. Follow-up were conducted on five rabbits with eight T-TEVGs at three months, two rabbits with two T-TEVGs at six months, and two rabbits with two T-TEVGs at twelve months. At follow-up, percutaneous optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed, and OCT-derived luminal vessel wall dimensions and fractional flow reserve (OFR) derived from OCT were assessed. Results The overall pooled analysis at different timepoints on follow-up, documented an average MLA of 1.74±0.48mm2, average of proximal and distal reference area of 4.55±0.99 mm2, average area stenosis of 61±12%, and mean OFR value of 0.96±0.03 (OFR ranging from 0.89 to 0.99). There was a moderate positive correlation between minimum lumen area and OFR (r=0.590, p< 0.01). There was a strong negative correlation between percentage area stenosis and OFR (r= - 0.846, p< 0.01). At no timepoint in follow-up and in every vessel analysed, OFR value was lower than 0.89, suggesting that none of these vessels exhibited flow-limiting narrowing. Our study has a few limitations. 1) The preclinical model is a non-atherosclerotic rabbit; 2) There was no barotrauma prior to the implantation of the device; 3) Limited sample size, short and medium follow-up duration, and pooling of assessment at different timepoints. Conclusion The current study shows the durability and favourable hemodynamics of this bioresorbable fibrillated scaffold at short and medium term follow-up, supporting the potential utility of T-TEVEGs for peripheral human artery revascularisation. Long-term follow-ups are mandatory to confirm the durability of these results. Histopathology of this preclinical model should confirm the endoluminal elastin as previously documented in rodents (rats) and will be presented at the time of the congress.