Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ecosystem
Switch app
TR
About
FAQ
Sign in
Get started
Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature — Athina Tatsioni (2007) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature
Shared by
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature
Article
2007
en
Authors
AT
Athina Tatsioni
NB
Nikolaos G. Bonitsis
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Abstract
1 min read
Claims from highly cited observational studies persist and continue to be supported in the medical literature despite strong contradictory evidence from randomized trials.
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Article
2005
Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research
John P A Ioannidis
Article
2018
Claims That Anthropogenic Stressors Facilitate Jellyfish Blooms Have Been Amplified Beyond the Available Evidence: A Systematic Review
Kylie A. Pitt
,
Cathy H. Lucas
,
Robert H. Condon
,
Carlos M. Duarte
,
Ben Stewart‐Koster
Preprint
2022
High-cited favorable studies for COVID-19 treatments ineffective in large trials
John P A Ioannidis
Article
2018
Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: re-defining ‘real-world data’ within the broader data universe
Alexander C. Fanaroff
,
Jan Steffel
,
John H. Alexander
,
Professor Gregory Lip
,
Robert M. Califf
,
Renato D. Lópes
Article
2015
Optimizing mean arterial pressure in septic shock: a critical reappraisal of the literature
Marc Léone
,
Pierre Asfar
,
Peter Radermacher
,
Jean Louis Vincent
,
Claude Martin
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.