Periprocedural Assessment of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using Diastolic Delta and Videodensitometry — Maxim J. P. Rooijakkers (2024) | RDL Network
Periprocedural Assessment of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using Diastolic Delta and Videodensitometry
Journal of the American Heart Association 13(18)
Article 2024 English
Authors
MR
Maxim J. P. Rooijakkers
AE
Ahmed Elkoumy
NS
Niels A. Stens
Abstract
1 min read
Background Paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, posing an increased risk of heart failure and mortality. Accurate intraprocedural quantification of PVR is challenging. Both hemodynamic indices and videodensitometry can be used for intraprocedural assessment of PVR. We compared the predictive value of the isolated versus combined use of the hemodynamic index diastolic delta (DD) and videodensitometry for the incidence of relevant PVR 1 month after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Methods and Results In this prospective cohort study, patients underwent periprocedural PVR assessment by DD and videodensitometry (using left ventricular outflow tract—aortic regurgitation [LVOT‐AR]). Cardiac magnetic resonance served as reference modality for PVR assessment. Relevant PVR was defined as cardiac magnetic resonance–regurgitant fraction >20%. Fifty‐one patients were enrolled in this study. Mean age was 80.6±5.2 years and 45.1% of patients were men. Mean LVOT‐AR and cardiac magnetic resonance–regurgitant fraction were 8.2%±7.8% and 11.7%±9.6%, respectively. The correlation between DD and LVOT‐AR was weak ( r =−0.36). DD and LVOT‐AR showed a comparable accuracy to predict relevant PVR (area under the curve 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69–0.95 versus area area under the time–density curve 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62–0.99). The combination of DD and LVOT‐AR improved the prediction of relevant PVR (area under the time–density curve, 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81–0.99), and resulted in an increased concordance (86.3%) and positive predictive value (75%) compared with DD alone (76.5% and 40%, respectively), or LVOT‐AR alone (82.3% and 50%, respectively). Conclusions DD and videodensitometry are both accurate and feasible modalities for the assessment of PVR after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The synergistic use of both techniques increases the predictive value for relevant PVR after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04281771.
Mohammad Abdelghani, Yosuke Miyazaki, Ellen de Boer, Jean-Paul Aben, Math van Sloun, T Suchecki, Marcel van ’t Veer, Osama Soliman, Yoshinobu Onuma, Robbert de Winter, Pim A.L. Tonino, Frans N. van de Vosse, Marcel C. M. Rutten, Patrick W. Serruys
Mohamed Abdel‐Wahab, Mohammad Abdelghani, Yosuke Miyazaki, Erik W. Holy, Constanze Merten, Dirk Zachow, Pim A.L. Tonino, Marcel C. M. Rutten, Frans N. van de Vosse, Marie-Angèle Morel, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick W. Serruys, Gert Richardt, Osama Soliman
Hesham Elzomor, Timotheus J Neumann, L.B. Vilas Boas, Philipp Ruile, Mahmoud Abdelshafy, Ahmed Elkoumy, Pruthvi C. Revaiah, Tsung‐Ying Tsai, Klaus Kaier, Osama Soliman, Mirosław Ferenc, Dirk Westermann, Franz‐Josef Neumann, Patrick W. Serruys, Simon Schoechlin
Yosuke Miyazaki, Rodrigo Modolo, Mohammad Abdelghani, Hiroki Tateishi, Rafael Cavalcante, Carlos Collet, Taku Asano, Yuki Katagiri, Erhan Tenekecioğlu, Rogério Sarmento‐Leite, José Armando Mangione, Alexandre Abizaid, Osama Soliman, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick W. Serruys, Pedro A. Lemos, Fábio Sândoli de Brito
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.