Panel stacking is a threat to consensus statement validity

Kasper P. Kepp; Preben Aavitsland; Marcel Ballin; Francois Balloux; Stefan Baral; Kevin Bardosh; Howard Bauchner; Eran Bendavid; Raj Bhopal; Daniel T. Blumstein; Paolo Boffetta; Florence Bourgeois; Adam Brufsky; Peter J Collignon; Sally Cripps; Ioana A Cristea; Nigel Curtis; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Oliver Faude; Maria Elena Flacco; Gordon Guyatt; George Hajishengallis; Lars G Hemkens; Tammy Hoffmann; Ari R Joffe; Terry P. Klassen; Despina Koletsi; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Ellen Kuhl; Carlo La Vecchia; Tea Lallukka; John Lambris; Michael Levitt; Spyros Makridakis; Helena C Maltezou; Lamberto Manzoli; Ana Marusic; Clio Mavragani; David Moher; Ben W Mol; Taulant Muka; Florian Naudet; Paul W. Noble; Anna Nordström; Peter Nordström; Nikolaos Pandis; Stefania Papatheodorou; Chirag J Patel; Irene Petersen; Stefan Pilz; Nikolaus Plesnila; Anne-Louise Ponsonby; Manuel A Rivas; Andrea Saltelli; Manuel Schabus; Michaéla C Schippers; Holger Schünemann; Marco Solmi; Andreas Stang; Hendrik Streeck; Joachim P. Sturmberg; Lehana Thabane; Brett D Thombs; Athanassios Tsakris; Simon N Wood; John P A Ioannidis

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111428

Article2014

Expert panel consensus statement on the optimal use of pomalidomide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Meletios A Dimopoulos, Xavier Leleu, Antonio Palumbo, Philippe Moreau, Michel Delforge, Michèle Cavo, Heinz Ludwig, Gareth J. Morgan, Faith E. Davies, Pieter Sonneveld, Stephen Schey, Sonja Zweegman, Mona Hansson, Katja Weisel, MV Mateos, T. Facon, Jesús F. San Miguel

Article2012

Whose Consensus Is It Anyway? Scientific Versus Legalistic Conceptions of Validity

Denny Borsboom

Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives

Preprint2019

Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process

Samantha Cukier, Manoj M. Lalu, Gregory L. Bryson, Kelly D. Cobey, Agnes Grudniewicz, David Moher

Article2020

Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process

Samantha Cukier, Manoj M. Lalu, Gregory L. Bryson, Kelly D. Cobey, Agnes Grudniewicz, David Moher

Article2010

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a consensus statement

James R. Berenson, Kenneth C. Anderson, Robert A. Audell, Ralph V. Boccia, Morton Coleman, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Matthew T. Drake, Rafaël Fonseca, Jean‐Luc Harousseau, Douglas Joshua, Sagar Lonial, Rubén Niesvizky, Antonio Palumbo, G. David Roodman, Jesús F. San Miguel, Seema Singhal, Donna M. Weber, Maurizio Zangari, Eric Wirtschafter, Ori Yellin, Robert A. Kyle

Panel stacking is a threat to consensus statement validity

Discussion(0)

Related publications

Expert panel consensus statement on the optimal use of pomalidomide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Whose Consensus Is It Anyway? Scientific Versus Legalistic Conceptions of Validity

Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process

Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a consensus statement