P5631The impact of plaque type on strut embedment/protrusion and shear stress distribution in bioresorbable scaffold

Background and aim Scaffold design and plaque characteristics influence implantation outcomes and local flow dynamics in treated coronary segments. Our aim is to assess the impact of strut embedment/protrusion of bioresorbable scaffold on local shear stress distribution in different atherosclerotic plaque types. Method Fifteen Absorb everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds were implanted in human epicardial coronary arteries. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed post-scaffold implantation and strut embedment/protrusion were analyzed using a dedicated software. OCT data was fused with angiography to reconstruct three-dimensional coronary anatomy. Blood flow simulation was performed and wall shear stress (WSS) was estimated in each scaffolded surface and the relationship between strut embedment/protrusion and WSS was evaluated. Results There were 9083 struts analysed. Ninety-seven percent of the struts (n=8840) were well apposed and 243 (3%) were malapposed. At cross-section level (n=1289), strut embedment was significantly increased in fibroatheromatous plaques (76±48μm) and decreased in fibro-calcific plaques (35±52 μm). Compatible with strut embedment, WSS was significantly higher in lipid-rich fibroatheromatous plaques (1.50±0.81Pa), whereas significantly decreased in fibro-calcified plaques (1.05±0.91Pa). After categorization of WSS as low (<1.0 Pa) and normal/high WSS (≥1.0 Pa), the percent of low-WSS in the plaque subgroups were 30.1%, 31.1%, 25.4% and 36.2% for non-diseased vessel wall, fibrous plaque, fibro-atheromatous plaque and fibro-calcific plaque, respectively (p-overall<0.001). Table 1. Cross-section level Embedment/Protrusion and WSS according to the plaque type Plaque type Embedment depth (μm) Protrusion distance (μm) WSS (Pa) Non-atherosclerotic intimal thickening/normal vessel wall (n=2275) 47±34*Δ¥ 123±34¶Ξπ 1.44±0.9解 Fibrous (n=4191) 53±40*#& 118±38¶Ψ‡ 1.24±0.78αθ∞ Fibroatheromatous (n=2027) 76±48#ΦΔ 94.6±46Ω†Ψπ 1.50±0.81Σ§α Fibro-calcific (n=590) 35±52&Φ¥ 139±50‡†Ξ 1.05±0.91∞£Σ For embedment: *p=0.09, #p<0.001, &p<0.001, Φp<0.0001, Δp<0.0001, ¥p<0.0001. For protrusion: ¶p=0.74, Ξp<0.0001, πp<0.0001, Ψp<0.0001, ‡p<0.0001, †p<0.0001. For WSS: θp<0.001, §p=0.06, £p<0.0001, αp<0.0001, ∞p<0.0001, Ωp<0.0001. n=total strut number in each plaque type, p-values come from mixed-effects regression analysis. Conclusion The composition of the underlying plaque influences strut embedment which seems to have effect on WSS. The struts deeply embedded in lipid-rich fibroatheromas plaques resulted in higher WSS compared to the other plaque types.