The future of critical care medicine will be shaped not only by the evidence-validated foundations of science, but also by innovations based on unproven and, in many cases, untested concepts and thoughtful visions of scientists and clinicians familiar with the complex problems actually faced in clinical practice. Clinical investigations and trials often lag behind collective experience and impressions, in a well-intentioned and necessary quest to determine the fallacy or validity of ongoing practice. Progress made in this way can be painfully slow, and imperfect theory may prove difficult to challenge. On occasion, an innovative paradigm shift fostered by a novel approach can reorient the forces of academic investigation toward generating an evidence base upon which such concepts and interpretations can find scientific justification. This discussion presents a selected set of ideas to improve the future practice of critical care - each having a defensible rationale, but unconfirmed validity.
John J. Marini, Daniel De Backer, Luciano Gattinoni, Can İnce, Ignacio Martín‐Loeches, Pierre Singer, Mervyn Singer, Martin Westphal, Jean Louis Vincent
John J. Marini, Luciano Gattinoni, Can İnce, Sibylle A. Kozek‐Langenecker, Ravindra L. Mehta, Claude Pichard, Martin Westphal, Paul E. Wischmeyer, Jean Louis Vincent
Maurizio Cecconi, Massimiliano Greco, Benjamin Shickel, Derek C. Angus, Heatherlee Bailey, Elena Bignami, Thierry Calandra, Leo Anthony Celi, Sharon Einav, Paul Elbers, Ari Ercole, Hernando Gómez, Michelle N. Gong, Matthieu Komorowski, Vincent X. Liu, Soojin Park, Aarti Sarwal, Christopher W. Seymour, Fernando G. Zampieri, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Jean Louis Vincent, Azra Bihorac
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.