On the effect of pressure coefficient source on the energy demand of an isolated cross-ventilated building

Natural ventilation is a simple and effective measure to both reduce the cooling demand of buildings and improve the indoor air quality. In the prediction of heating and cooling demands by means of building energy simulations (BES), the use of pressure coefficients (Cp) from databases as input for the airflow network model is the common approach. Cp values for the same building typology may differ according to the adopted database and are generally unavailable for buildings with complex geometry. Employed Cp values may lead to differences in BES results. This manuscript presents a comparison, for different wind directions, between the Cp distributions and mean values on the facades of a detached building obtained with full-scale CFD – Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) – simulations, from a database and from wind-tunnel experiments. The obtained pressure coefficients are used in the BES of a naturally ventilated building and the energy demand difference between the four approaches is quantified. Four climate zones (tropical, dry/desertic, temperate, continental) are considered. Although, in terms of accuracy of Cp prediction, LES outperforms RANS for all the wind directions considered, annual cooling energy demand is found to be relatively insensitive to the source of Cp for the current case study, while predicted peak cooling values differ up to 10.8%. On the other hand, the prediction of annual heating energy demand in cold climates varies up to 3% depending on the Cp source employed for BES simulations.