In their recently published paper, Ramoglou and Tsang (2015) try to position continuing debates about the objectivity and subjectivity of entrepreneurial opportunities within a broader debate about critical realism and social constructionism. The authors adopt a view originally proposed by Bhakshar (1994, 1998, 2008) which suggests that all science — both physical and social — can be understood through a critical realist lens. However, the approach taken in this paper has three important weaknesses: the study of the physical and social world are not distinguished, the view of opportunities is tautological, and the need for empirical testing is ignored.
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.