O3‐05‐05: EFFECTS OF A MULTIDOMAIN LIFESTYLE INTERVENTION ON OVERALL RISK FOR DEMENTIA: THE FINGER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL — Alina Solomon (2018) | RDL Network
O3‐05‐05: EFFECTS OF A MULTIDOMAIN LIFESTYLE INTERVENTION ON OVERALL RISK FOR DEMENTIA: THE FINGER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Alzheimer s & Dementia 14(7S_Part_19)
Article 2018 English
Authors
AS
Alina Solomon
EL
Esko Levälahti
RA
Riitta Antikaínen
Abstract
2 min read
Estimating the impact of lifestyle interventions on dementia prevention can be difficult when interventions start early, before onset of substantial cognitive impairment. One solution could be using tools for estimating dementia risk as potential outcome measures. The CAIDE Dementia Risk Score was the first validated tool for estimating dementia risk based on a midlife profile (score range 0-15 points). This study investigated the impact of lifestyle changes on changes in the CAIDE score during 2 years. The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) was a 2-year randomized controlled trial in 1260 older adults at risk for cognitive decline. Participants were recruited from previous non-intervention surveys (6 sites across Finland). Inclusion criteria were age 60-77 years, CAIDE score at least 6 points based on previous data on midlife risk factors, and cognition at mean level or slightly lower than expected for age. Participants were randomly assigned to the lifestyle intervention (diet, exercise, cognitive training and vascular risk management; n=631) or control (general health advice; n=629) groups. For these exploratory analyses, CAIDE score was calculated at baseline, 12-month and 24-month visits. A mixed-effects regression model with maximum likelihood estimation was used to investigate change in CAIDE score as a function of randomisation group, time, and group×time interaction. Analyses were adjusted for study site. Mean CAIDE score (SD) at the baseline FINGER visit was not significantly different between intervention and control groups: 7.88 (1.83) versus 7.84 (1.867) points, p=0.69. Estimated mean change (SE) in CAIDE score at 2 years was -0.32 (0.06) in the intervention group and -0.15 (0.06) in the control group. The mean difference between groups (group × time interaction) in change of CAIDE score per year was -0.08 (95%CI -0.16 to -0.004, p=0.039). The CAIDE score showed a significant intervention benefit on reducing the overall dementia risk level in FINGER trial participants. Considering that this score is based on simple cut-offs for risk factors, an important area for future development would be dementia risk estimation tools that are even more sensitive to capturing lifestyle changes.
Alina Solomon, Ron Handels, Anders Wimo, Riitta Antikaínen, Tiina Laatikainen, Esko Levälahti, Markku Peltonen, Hilkka Soininen, Timo Strandberg, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Miia Kivipelto, Tiia Ngandu
Alina Solomon, Ron Handels, Anders Wimo, Riitta Antikaínen, Tiina Laatikainen, Esko Levälahti, Markku Peltonen, Hilkka Soininen, Timo Strandberg, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Miia Kivipelto, Tiia Ngandu
Alina Solomon, Ron Handels, Anders Wimo, Riitta Antikaínen, Tiina Laatikainen, Esko Levälahti, Markku Peltonen, Hilkka Soininen, Timo Strandberg, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Miia Kivipelto, Tiia Ngandu
Ruth Stephen, Tiia Ngandu, Yawu Liu, Markku Peltonen, Riitta Antikaínen, Nina Kemppainen, Tiina Laatikainen, Jyrki Lötjönen, Juha O. Rinne, Timo Strandberg, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Ritva Vanninen, Hilkka Soininen, Miia Kivipelto, Alina Solomon
Alina Solomon, Esko Levälahti, Hilkka Soininen, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Jaana Lindström, Jenni Lehtisalo, Markku Peltonen, Miia Kivipelto, Riitta Antikaínen, Teemu Paajanen, Tiia Ngandu, Tiina Laatikainen, Timo Strandberg, Tuomo Hänninen
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.