Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ecosystem
Switch app
TR
About
FAQ
Sign in
Get started
Nonrandomized studies using causal-modeling may give different answers than RCTs: a meta-epidemiological study — Hannah Ewald (2019) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Nonrandomized studies using causal-modeling may give different answers than RCTs: a meta-epidemiological study
Shared by
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Nonrandomized studies using causal-modeling may give different answers than RCTs: a meta-epidemiological study
Article
2019
en
Authors
+3 more
HE
Hannah Ewald
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
AL
Aviv Ladanie
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Article
2015
Small studies are more heterogeneous than large ones: a meta-meta-analysis
Joanna IntHout
,
John P A Ioannidis
,
George F. Borm
,
Jelle J. Goeman
Article
2012
A multiplex immunoassay gives different results than singleplex immunoassays which may bias epidemiologic associations
Lawrence de Koning
,
Cary Liptak
,
Aida Shkreta
,
Gary Bradwin
,
Frank B Hu
,
Aruna D. Pradhan
,
Nader Rifai
,
Mark D. Kellogg
Article
2019
Consideration of confounding was suboptimal in the reporting of observational studies in psychiatry: a meta-epidemiological study
Klaus Munkholm
,
Maria Faurholt‐Jepsen
,
John P A Ioannidis
,
Lars G. Hemkens
Article
2023
Mapping and systematic appraisal of umbrella reviews in epidemiological research: a protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
Lazaros Belbasis
,
Robin D Brooker
,
Emmanuel A. Zavalis
,
Angelo Maria Pezzullo
,
Cathrine Axfors
,
John P A Ioannidis
Article
2017
On the importance of modeling fMRI transients when estimating effective connectivity: A dynamic causal modeling study using ASL data
Martin Havlíček
,
Alard Roebroeck
,
Karl Friston
,
Anna Gardumi
,
Dimo Ivanov
,
Kâmil Uludaǧ
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.