Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAFV600-mutant resectable melanoma: the randomized phase 2 NeoTrio trial — Georgina V. Long (2024) | RDL Network
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAFV600-mutant resectable melanoma: the randomized phase 2 NeoTrio trial
Article 2024 en
Authors
GL
Georgina V. Long
MC
Matteo S. Carlino
GA
George Au‐Yeung
Abstract
1 min read
Immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF-targeted therapy each improve survival in melanoma. Immune changes early during targeted therapy suggest the mechanisms of each drug class could work synergistically. In the non-comparative, randomized, phase 2 NeoTrio trial, we investigated whether targeted therapy could boost the proportion of patients achieving long-term recurrence-free survival with neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable stage III BRAF<sup>V600</sup>-mutant melanoma. Sixty patients (42% females) were randomized to pembrolizumab alone (n = 20), sequential therapy (dabrafenib plus trametinib followed by pembrolizumab; n = 20) or concurrent (triple) therapy (n = 20), followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy. The primary outcome was pathological response; secondary outcomes included radiographic response, recurrence-free survival, overall survival, surgical outcomes, peripheral blood and tumor analyses and safety. The pathological response rate was 55% (11/20; including six pathological complete responses (pCRs)) with pembrolizumab, 50% (10/20; three pCRs) with sequential therapy and 80% (16/20; ten pCRs) with concurrent therapy, which met the primary outcome in each arm. Treatment-related adverse events affected 75-100% of patients during neoadjuvant treatment, with seven early discontinuations (all in the concurrent arm). At 2 years, event-free survival was 60% with pembrolizumab, 80% with sequential therapy and 71% with concurrent therapy. Recurrences after major pathological response were more common in the targeted therapy arms, suggesting a reduction in response 'quality' when targeted therapy is added to neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Risking the curative potential of immunotherapy in melanoma cannot be justified. Pending longer follow-up, we suggest that immunotherapy and targeted therapy should not be combined in the neoadjuvant setting for melanoma. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02858921 .
Alexander M. Menzies, Robyn P.M. Saw, Serigne Lo, Maria Gonzalez, Sydney Ch’ng, Omgo E. Nieweg, Kerwin F. Shannon, Peter M. Ferguson, Jenny Lee, Helen Rizos, Robert V. Rawson, Jonathan R. Stretch, John F. Thompson, Louise Emmett, Rony Kapoor, Andrew J. Spillane, Richard A Scolyer, Georgina V. Long
Jennifer A. Wargo, Rodabe N. Amaria, Merrick I. Ross, Robyn P.M. Saw, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Patrick Hwu, Sapna P. Patel, Isabella Claudia Glitza, Adi Diab, Richard Kefford, Richard A Scolyer, Helen Rizos, John F. Thompson, Kerwin F. Shannon, Andrew J. Spillane, Matteo S. Carlino, Alex Guminski, Lauren Simpson, Michael A. Davies, Georgina V. Long
Georgina V. Long, Nitya Nair, Daniel Marbach, Richard A Scolyer, Sabine Wilson, Denise Cotting, Nicolas Städler, Rodabe N. Amaria, Paolo A. Ascierto, Ahmad A. Tarhini, Caroline Robert, Omid Hamid, Caroline Gaudy‐Marqueste, Célèste Lebbé, Eva Muñoz‐Couselo, Alexander M. Menzies, Cécile Pagès, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mario Mandalà, Nikki Jessop, Maurizio Perdicchio,
Maria Gonzalez, Alexander M. Menzies, Thomas E. Pennington, Robyn P.M. Saw, Andrew J. Spillane, Jonathan R. Stretch, Kerwin F. Shannon, Sydney Ch’ng, Omgo E. Nieweg, Maria Cruzado Rojas, Monica Osorio, Robert V. Rawson, Peter M. Ferguson, Helen Rizos, Serigne Lo, Richard A Scolyer, Georgina V. Long
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.