Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 34(5): S186-S186
Article 2002 English
Authors
WH
Wim Huygens
MT
Martine Thomis
MP
Maarten Peeters
Abstract
2 min read
Interindividual differences in muscle mass are due to environmental factors but also for a large part due to genetic determination. Earlier studies provide heritability estimates > 75%. Identifying a gene for muscle mass might also be a causative gene for maximal musclular strength due to the moderate to high correlation between these two traits. Results from animal studies show that myostatin (GDF-8) is an important regulator of muscle development. The high degree of myostatin sequence conservation in non-human species led to this study to see whether GDF-8 is also responsible for a part of the interindividual differences in muscle mass in humans. PURPOSE: To test whether myostatin is associated with muscle mass in a human case-control study. METHODS: An extended set of anthropometrical measurements was taken from 50 male power athletes (29.8 ± 8.8 years) and 57 control subjects (22.4 ± 3.7 years), not selected for muscularity. Muscle mass was determined by circumference measures corrected by skinfolds. Using mathematical formulas muscle mass of am and leg was calculated. Four recently described polymorphic sites in the myostatin gene were genotyped: Ala 55, Lys 193, Glut 164 and Pro 198. RESULTS: There appeared to be no evidence for allele frequency differences in the four studied polymorphisms in the myostatin gene between the two groups, indicating that variation in muscle hypertrophy is not associated with variation at the myostatin locus. Also myostatin sequence variation within groups was sparse. Only two individuals, one in the control and one in the power athlete group, were heterozygous for K153R. Their extremity muscle mass indicators as well as somatotype components did not indicate a specific extreme phenotypic profile in both K153R heterozygotes. CONCLUSION: The lack of a significant relationship between myostatin genotypes and overall muscle mass might suggest that muscularity is not significantly influenced by genetic variation at the myostatin locus.
Theresa H. Wirtz, Sven H. Loosen, Lukas Buendgens, Berkan Kurt, Samira Abu Jhaisha, Philipp Hohlstein, Jonathan F. Brozat, Ralf Weiskirchen, Tom Luedde, Frank Tacke, Christian Trautwein, Christoph Roderburg, Alexander Koch
Created:June 19, 2026
Article2012
Cripto regulates skeletal muscle regeneration and modulates satellite cell determination by antagonizing myostatin
Ombretta Guardiola, Peggy Lafuste, Silvia Brunelli, Salvatore Iaconis, Thierry Touvier, Philippos Mourikis, Katrien De Bock, Enza Lonardo, Gennaro Andolfi, Ann Bouché, Giovanna L. Liguori, Michael M. Shen, Shahragim Tajbakhsh, Giulio Cossu, Peter Carmeliet, Gabriella Minchiotti
Martine Thomis, Wim Huygens, Maarten Peeters, Ruth J. F. Loos, Leen Van Langendonck, Johan Lefevre, Albrecht Claessens, Marie‐Christine Chagnon, Robert Vlietinck, Claude Bouchard
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.