Multi-Institutional Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Incident Learning: Evaluation of Safety Barriers Using a Human Factors Analysis and Classification System — Ross McGurk (2022) | RDL Network
Multi-Institutional Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Incident Learning: Evaluation of Safety Barriers Using a Human Factors Analysis and Classification System
Article 2022 en
Authors
RM
Ross McGurk
KN
Katherine Woch Naheedy
TK
T.K. Kosak
Abstract
1 min read
OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can improve therapeutic ratios and patient convenience, but delivering higher doses per fraction increases the potential for patient harm. Incident learning systems (ILSs) are being increasingly adopted in radiation oncology to analyze reported events. This study used an ILS coupled with a Human Factor Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) and barriers management to investigate the origin and detection of SBRT events and to elucidate how safeguards can fail allowing errors to propagate through the treatment process. METHODS: Reported SBRT events were reviewed using an in-house ILS at 4 institutions over 2014-2019. Each institution used a customized care path describing their SBRT processes, including designated safeguards to prevent error propagation. Incidents were assigned a severity score based on the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group Report 275. An HFACS system analyzed failing safeguards. RESULTS: One hundred sixty events were analyzed with 106 near misses (66.2%) and 54 incidents (33.8%). Fifty incidents were designated as low severity, with 4 considered medium severity. Incidents most often originated in the treatment planning stage (38.1%) and were caught during the pretreatment review and verification stage (37.5%) and treatment delivery stage (31.2%). An HFACS revealed that safeguard failures were attributed to human error (95.2%), routine violation (4.2%), and exceptional violation (0.5%) and driven by personnel factors 32.1% of the time, and operator condition also 32.1% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Improving communication and documentation, reducing time pressures, distractions, and high workload should guide proposed improvements to safeguards in radiation oncology.
Michael Buckstein, Edward Kim, Umut Özbek, Parissa Tabrizian, Ganesh Gunasekaran, Marcelo Facciuto, Kenneth E. Rosenzweig, Josep M. Llovet, Myron Schwartz
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Dominik Bettinger, David J. Pinato, Maximilian Schultheiß, Rishi Sharma, Lorenza Rimassa, Tiziana Pressiani, Michela Emma Burlone, Mario Pirisi, Masatoshi Kudo, J.W. Park, Nico Buettner, Christoph Neumann‐Haefelin, Tobias Boettler, N. Abbasi-Senger, H. Alheit, Wolfgang W. Baus, Oliver Blanck, S. Gerum, Matthias Gückenberger, Daniel Habermehl, C. Ostheimer, Oliver Riesterer, Jörg Tamihardja, A.-L. Grosu, Robert Thimme, Thomas Brunner, Eleni Gkika
Edward Kim, Alex Sher, Ghadi Abboud, Myron Schwartz, Marcelo Facciuto, Parissa Tabrizian, Karin Knešaurek, A. Fischman, Rahul Patel, S.F. Nowakowski, Josep M. Llovet, Bachir Taouli, R. Lookstein
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.