Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Claire Madigan; Nikolaos Pandis; Martin Loef; Harald Walach; Sebastian Sauer; Jos Kleijnen; Jadbinder Seehra; Tess Johnson; Stefan Schmidt; Jeremy Howick; Despina Koletsi; John P A Ioannidis

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.017

Back

Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Article 2022 en

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2022

Most Healthcare Interventions Tested in Cochrane Reviews are Not Effective According to High Quality Evidence: A Meta-Epidemiological Study

Jeremy Howick, Despina Koletsi, John P A Ioannidis, Claire Madigan, Nikolaos Pandis, Martin Loef, Harald Walach, Sebastian Sauer, Jos Kleijnen, Jadbinder Seehra, Tess Johnson, Stefan Schmidt

Article2016

High quality of the evidence for medical and other health-related interventions was uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews

Padhraig S. Fleming, Despina Koletsi, John P A Ioannidis, Nikolaos Pandis

Article2020

The quality of evidence for medical interventions does not improve or worsen: a metaepidemiological study of Cochrane reviews

Jeremy Howick, Despina Koletsi, Nikolaos Pandis, Padhraig S. Fleming, Martin Loef, Harald Walach, Stefan Schmidt, John P A Ioannidis

Editorial Material2018

Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure

Morten Hylander Møller, John P A Ioannidis, Michaël Darmon

Article2010

A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Simon Bow, Jeffrey A. Klassen, Annabritt Chisholm, Lisa Tjosvold, Denise Thomson, Terry P. Klassen, David Moher, Lisa Hartling