Migration of Metal-on-Metal Versus Ceramic-on-Polyethylene Hip Prostheses

In a prospective randomized study, 32 metal-on-metal prostheses and 29 ceramic-on-polyethylene prostheses of similar design were implanted in 59 patients. Radiolucency, cup migration, wear, and function were examined after a minimum of 2 years followup (followup rate, 87%). The purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether higher frictional torque of metal-on-metal will lead to a higher rate of early metal-on-metal cup loosening. A computer-assisted method was used for wear and migration measurements of the acetabular component. Metal-on-metal prostheses migrated in a craniocaudad direction significantly less than ceramic-on-polyethylene prostheses. The mean total migration for both types of prostheses exceeded 1.5 mm at 2 years. Clinically, no difference between the two prostheses regarding activity, pain, or range of motion was found at 2 years. As migration of metal-on-metal prostheses was not higher in comparison with ceramic-on-polyethylene prostheses, the expected higher frictional torque of metal-on-metal prostheses did not increase migration during short-term followup. The different debris produced by both bearings did not influence the short-term results of this study, but might cause different long-term results.