Linking physical landscape properties to perceived landscape features: potentials in NILS monitoring program
Proceedings of the 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology
Article 2018 English
Authors
MH
Marcus Hedblom
SA
Sven Adler
MB
Małgorzata Blicharska
Abstract
1 min read
operties” are measured field data such as cover of spruce. In doing that we aim at enabling the use of monitoring data as a proxy for evaluate landscape perception changes over time. We used the Swedish national environmental objectives as a framework policy, since those objectives include targets that are linked to landscape perception. So far, however, no indicators have been defined to follow them up. We collected information on how people with a professional background linked to mountain areas, such as officials at governmental organisations and business companies, perceive the Swedish mountains. In an enquiry the respondent’s rated pre-defined attributes linked to perceptions of mountain landscapes, as well as described the perceptions with their own words. The output data were later subjectively linked to physical landscape properties monitored in the NILS program. The landscape feature primarily associated to Swedish mountains were “view”, “openness” and “open landscapes”, whereas “spruce” and “pine” that contradict openness were much lower rated. We suggest that by assessing physical landscape properties using monitoring data, it is possible to evaluate people’s potentially positive or negative perceptions of landscapes, as well as changes in perceptions that may occur when the landscape change. These linkages could be used to evaluate the potential of a landscape to provide restoratives or aesthetical values of landscapes over time. Results from the evaluations could also be used for guiding landscape management to increase certain perception values and address negative impacts of land-use decisions on other values.
Marcus Hedblom, Henrik Hedenås, Małgorzata Blicharska, Sven Adler, Igor Knez, Grzegorz Mikusiński, Johan Svensson, Sven Sandström, Per Sandström, David A. Wardle
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.