Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease — Jamie Diamond (2018) | RDL Network
Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease
КАРДИОЛОГИЯ УЗБЕКИСТАНА 11(24): 2441-2450
Article 2018 English
Authors
JD
Jamie Diamond
MM
Mahesh V. Madhavan
JS
Joseph F. Sabik
Abstract
2 min read
Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine whether high-risk patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) and prior cerebrovascular disease (CEVD) preferentially benefit from revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Background
Patients with known CEVD requiring revascularization are often referred to PCI rather than CABG. There is a paucity of data regarding the impact of CEVD in patients with LMCAD undergoing revascularization.
Methods
In the EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) trial, patients with LMCAD and low or intermediate SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) scores were randomized to PCI with everolimus-eluting stents versus CABG. The effects of prior CEVD, defined as prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or carotid artery disease, on 30-day and 3-year event rates were assessed.
Results
Prior CEVD was present in 233 of 1,898 patients (12.3%). These patients were older and had higher rates of comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, chronic kidney disease, and prior PCI, compared with those without prior CEVD. Patients with prior CEVD had higher rates of stroke at 30 days (2.2% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.05) and 3 years (6.4% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.0003) and higher 3-year rates of the primary endpoint of all-cause death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (25.0% vs. 13.6%; p < 0.0001). The relative effects of PCI versus CABG on the 30-day and 3-year rates of stroke (pinteraction = 0.65 and 0.16, respectively) and the 3-year rates of the primary composite endpoint (pinteraction = 0.14) were consistent in patients with and those without prior CEVD.
Conclusions
Patients with LMCAD and prior CEVD compared with those without CEVD have higher rates of stroke and reduced event-free survival after revascularization. Data from the EXCEL trial do not a priori support a preferential role of PCI over CABG in patients with known CEVD.
Xin Huang, Björn Redfors, Shmuel Chen, Yangbo Liu, Ori Ben‐Yehuda, John D. Puskas, David E. Kandzari, Béla Merkely, Ferenc Horkay, Ad J. van Boven, Piet W. Boonstra, Joseph F. Sabik, Patrick W. Serruys, A. Pieter Kappetein, Gregg W. Stone
Shmuel Chen, Björn Redfors, Yangbo Liu, Mathias Vrolix, Carlos Macaya, Ori Ben‐Yehuda, A. Pieter Kappetein, Joseph F. Sabik, Patrick W. Serruys, Gregg W. Stone
Gennaro Giustino, Roxana Mehran, Patrick W. Serruys, Joseph F. Sabik, Milan Milojevic, Charles A. Simonton, John D. Puskas, David E. Kandzari, Marie-Claude Morice, David P. Taggart, Anthony Gershlick, Philippe Généreux, Zixuan Zhang, Thomas McAndrew, Björn Redfors, Michael Ragosta, Irving L. Kron, Ovidiu Dressler, Martin B. Leon, Stuart J. Pocock, Ori Ben‐Yehuda, A. Pieter Kappetein, Gregg W. Stone
Bahira Shahim, Björn Redfors, Shmuel Chen, Marie-Claude Morice, Bernard J. Gersh, John D. Puskas, David E. Kandzari, Béla Merkely, Ferenc Horkay, Aaron Crowley, Patrick W. Serruys, A. Pieter Kappetein, Joseph F. Sabik, Ori Ben‐Yehuda, Gregg W. Stone
Shmuel Chen, Björn Redfors, Patrick W. Serruys, A. Pieter Kappetein, Aaron Crowley, Ori Ben‐Yehuda, Iva Srdanovic, Nicholas Lembo, W. Morris Brown, Joseph F. Sabik, Gregg W. Stone
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.