Interobserver variability of histopathological assessment in <scp>pT1</scp> colorectal carcinoma
Article 2025 en
Authors
KG
Karmele Sáez de Gordoa
MD
María Daca-Álvarez
MR
María Teresa Rodrigo-Calvo
Abstract
1 min read
AIMS: Pathological evaluation of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) diagnosed at stage pT1 is challenging. Nevertheless, it is crucial for treatment guiding and to determine the patient's prognosis. This study aimed to assess the interobserver variability in the histopathological evaluation of pT1 CRC. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective multicentre pT1 CRC cohort study was designed (EpiT1 consortium). A task force comprising 20 experienced pathologists conducted the histopathological evaluation using digitalized haematoxylin-eosin (H&E) slides. A pilot study was performed with 10 cases, and afterwards, a consensus meeting was held to assess interobserver variability. Then, a concordance study was performed by assessing 70 new pT1 CRC cases. We used percentage agreement and Gwet's Agreement Coefficient 1 for categorical variables, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables. In the pilot study, histological grade and perineural invasion (PNI) demonstrated 100% agreement, with good concordance for lymphovascular invasion (LVI), tumour budding (TB), poorly differentiated clusters (PDC) and margin assessment. The concordance study showed high agreement (≥90%) on histological grade, PDC, PNI and LVI. Submucosal invasion depth showed excellent reliability in the concordance study (ICC = 0.97). Notably, in both studies, the agreement of PDC was higher than for TB. Lower concordance was observed on stromal lymphocytes and the status of muscularis mucosae. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the need for standardization in evaluating pT1 CRC to improve the concordance among pathologists, and the precision of digital measurements. Moreover, the addition of PDC assessment in pT1 CRC diagnostic guidelines could help to improve the accuracy of risk stratification and reliably predict prognosis.
María Daca-Álvarez, Diana Zaffalon, Isabel Portillo, Luís Bujanda, Inés Gil-Lasa, G. Ibañez Sanz, Alberto Herreros de Tejada, Inmaculada Salces, Gherzon Casanova, L. Aguilera, Marta Ponce, Ángeles Pizarro, David Barquero, Ignasi Puig, Fernando Martínez de Juan, Mireya Jimeno, M Alburquerque, Salvador Machlab, Ángel Ferrández, Beatriz Peñas, Álvaro Díaz‐González, L. Sargatal, Rodrigo Jover, L. Hernandez Villalba, A. Pérez Pedrosa, Eva Musulen, Goretti Hernández, M. Trelles, Ayako Ono, J. Lopez Vicente, María Pellisé
Alice P. Chen, Natasha Sharma, Shantel Olivares, Armita Bahrami, Raymond L. Barnhill, Willeke A.M. Blokx, Marcus Bosenberg, Klaus J. Busam, Arnaud de la Fouchardière, Lyn M. Duncan, David E. Elder, Jennifer S. Ko, Gilles Landman, Alexander J. Lazar, Cecilia Lezcano, Lori Lowe, Nigel Maher, Daniela Massi, Jane L. Messina, Daniela Mihic‐Probst, Douglas C. Parker, Margaret Redpath, Richard A Scolyer,
Frederik Barkhof, Massimo Filippi, Jan Hein van Waesberghe, Paul Molyneux, Marco Rovaris, GJ Lycklama a Nijeholt, Niall Tubridy, David H. Miller, Tarek Yousry, Ernst‐Wilhelm Radue, H. J. Adèr
Pedram Gerami, Klaus J. Busam, Alistair J. Cochran, Martin Cook, Lyn M. Duncan, David E. Elder, Douglas R. Fullen, Joan Guitart, Philip E. LeBoit, Martín C. Mihm, Víctor G. Prieto, Michael S. Rabkin, Richard A Scolyer, Xiaowei Xu, Sook Jung Yun, Roxana Obregon, Pedram Yazdan, Chelsea Cooper, Bing Bing Weitner, Alfred Rademaker, Raymond L. Barnhill
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.