Influence of polygenic risk for schizophrenia and cannabis use on cognition
Article 2025 en
Authors
AF
Alexis Palpán Flores
GC
Gontzal Garcı́a del Caño
EZ
Eric P. Zorrilla
Abstract
1 min read
Introduction There is increasing scientific evidence linking the influence of cannabis on the onset of a first psychotic episode (FEP). However, this association may not always be one-way when studying the relationship between cannabis use and cognition. The role of polygenic risk score for Schizophrenia (PRS-SZ) and lifetime cannabis initiation (PRSCI) and cannabis use disorder (PRSCUD) use remains unresolved. For this reason, a study was carried out to clarify how these factors are related to each other. Objectives To study the interaction between genetic risk and environmental factors To analyze the relationship between polygenic risk scores and clinical features To determine the impact of cannabis use on cognitive performance Methods A neuropsychological study was carried out on a sample of 138 cannabis users, divided into cases and controls according to the existence of a FEP. This assessment included domains of processing speed, verbal memory, attention, working memory, executive function, social cognition, and determination of premorbid IQ, using validated tests. Three GWAS summary statistics were used to calculate individual PRS conferring risk for SZ, CI and CUD. PRS were constructed using PRS-CS. The results obtained were then statistically correlated with the polygenic risk score for schizophrenia, cannabis use disorder, and lifetime cannabis use, respectively. Results The patient group presented worse processing speed as the risk for schizophrenia increased. In the case of PRS-CU, an opposite effect was evident. For verbal memory, a higher PRS-CUD was associated with poorer performance. Cannabis consumers with lifetime risk presented better executive function than consumers with lower genetic risk. Conclusions The relationship between PRS for Schizophrenia and cannabis use remains uncertain. However, different clinical profiles can be determined thanks to the cognitive assessment. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Àlex G. Segura, Anna Mané, L. Prohens, Natàlia Rodríguez, Gisela Mezquida, Manuel J Cuesta, Eduard Vieta, Sílvia Amoretti, António Lobo, Ana González‐Pinto, Covadonga M. Díaz‐Caneja, Alexandra Roldán Bejarano, Esther Jiménez, Immaculada Baeza, Teresa Legido, Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz, Miquel Bernardo, Sergi Mas
Irina Rannikko, Graham K. Murray, P. Juola, Henri Salo, Marianne Haapea, Jouko Miettunen, Juha Veijola, Jennifer H. Barnett, Anja P. Husa, Peter B. Jones, Paul M Ridker, Matti Isohanni, Erika Jääskeläinen
Itxaso González–Ortega, S. Alberich-Mesa, Enrique Echeburúa, Miquel Bernardo, Bibiana Cabrera, Sílvia Amoretti, António Lobo, Celso Arango, Iluminada Corripio, Eduard Vieta, Elena de la Serna, Roberto Rodríguez–Jiménez, Rafael Segarra, Jose M. López-Ilundain, Ana M. Sánchez-Torres, Manuel J. Cuesta, Ana González‐Pinto
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.