Increasing targeted therapy options for patients with relapsed cancer with broader somatic gene panel analysis from the primary tumor: The Profiler02 randomized phase II trial. — Olivier Trédan (2022) | RDL Network
Increasing targeted therapy options for patients with relapsed cancer with broader somatic gene panel analysis from the primary tumor: The Profiler02 randomized phase II trial.
Article 2022 en
Authors
OT
Olivier Trédan
DP
Damien Pouessel
NP
Nicolas Penel
Abstract
2 min read
3130 Background: PROFILER-02 is a multicenter randomized prospective study comparing the proportion of metastatic cancer patients (pts) with Targeted Agent (TA) recommendation provided by large NGS panel (FOne panel, 324 genes) vs home 87-gene NGS panel (CTRL) (PMID 30865223). Methods: Adult pts with advanced/metastatic cancer during 1 st or 2 nd line of therapy without known targetable gene alteration were eligible and randomized (1:1) to FOne vs CTRL panel. Both panels were performed for each patient. The randomization arm defined the first panel reviewed by dedicated Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) at disease progression while the 2 nd panel remained blinded. The primary objective was the pts rate with at least one TA recommendation by the MTB using either FOne or CTRL panel. The study was designed in order to detect difference in proportions of 10% between the two panels. A sample size of 289 pts with both panels were requested to show this difference with an expected proportion of discordant pairs of 20% using a McNemar's test with 98% power and 5% two-sided significance level. Secondary endpoints included number of pts receiving at least one TA, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: From June 2017 to June 2019, among the 339 included pts 171 and 168 pts were randomized in FOne or CTRL panels’ first use, respectively. Median age was 57 years [19.0 - 85.0]; 54.9% were female. The median time from randomization to first MTB was 7.62 months [range 0.80 - 48.1]. Among the 339 pts, 147 pts (43.4%) had no TA recommendation, 108 pts (31.9%) had at least one TA recommendation according to both panels, 67 pts (19.8%) had one or more TA recommendation according to FOne panel only and 17 pts (5%) according to CTRL panel only (McNemar p < 0.001). At the time of the analysis, 51/339 (15%) pts started recommended treatment: 27 pts (8%) with TA recommendation from both panels, 21 pts (6.2%) from FOne only and 3 pts (0.3%) from CTRL only. Main initiated TA were PARP inh. (FOne n = 12; CTRL n = 9), PI3K/AKT/mTOR inh. (FOne n = 10; CTRL n = 9) and immunotherapy (ICI) (FOne n = 7; CTRL n = 0). Median PFS following first MTB were 3.2 months (95% CI 2.5-3.8) and 2.6 months (95% CI 2.0-3.8), median OS were 8.7 months (95% CI 6.6-10.8) and 8.4 months (95% CI 6.4-9.7), in the FOne and CTRL arm, respectively. Conclusions: Larger NGS panel including Tumor Mutational Burden increased the number of recommended options (TA and ICI), as well as the number of treatment initiation. Clinical trial information: NCT03163732.
Vânia Hungria, Jesús F. San Miguel, Sung‐Soo Yoon, Meral Beksaç, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Ashraf Elghandour, W Wiktor-Jędrzejczak, Andreas Guenther, Thanyaphong Na Nakorn, Noppadol Siritanaratkul, Robert Schlossman, Jian Hou, Philippe Moreau, Sagar Lonial, Jae Hoon Lee, Hermann Einsele, Monika Sopala, Bourras‐Rezki Bengoudifa, Claudia Corrado, Paul G. Richardson
Johann S. de Bono, Christopher J. Sweeney, Sergio Bracarda, Cora N. Sternberg, Kim N., David Olmos, Shahneen Sandhu, Christophe Massard, Nobuaki Matsubara, Josep Garcia, Małgorzata Nowicka, Matthew Wongchenko, Zhen Shi
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.