Implications of the local haemodynamic forces on the phenotype of coronary plaques
Heart 105(14): 1078-1086
Article 2019 English
Authors
CB
Christos V. Bourantas
TZ
Thomas Zanchin
AS
Antonis I. Sakellarios
Abstract
1 min read
Aim To examine the effect of endothelial shear stress (ESS) on the dynamic changes in plaque phenotype. Methods Patients with myocardial infarction that had intravascular ultrasound-virtual histology (IVUS-VH) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and 13-month follow-up were studied. The IVUS-VH data were used to reconstruct the nonculprit vessels, and in the obtained models the ESS was estimated in 3 mm segments. Plaque morphology was derived in each segment from IVUS-VH and OCT. Disease progression was defined as the presence of ≥2 out of the following criteria: reduction in lumen area, increase in plaque burden and change of plaque morphology to a more vulnerable phenotype. Linear mixed effects models were used to assess the effect of ESS in different phenotypes. Results Sixty-eight vessels were included in the analysis. Low ESS was associated with plaque progression in all phenotypes. The effect of ESS on plaque burden (p for interaction=0.467) and phenotype (p for interaction=0.188) was similar in all plaque types, whereas the effect of ESS on the changes in lumen dimensions was more prominent in disease-free (β=0.70, p<0.001) than fibrotic/fibrocalcific (β=0.28, p<0.001) or lipid-rich plaques (β=0.15, p=0.015). Standalone IVUS-VH misclassified plaque morphology in one-third of the cases leading to erroneous estimations about the effect of ESS on plaque evolution in different phenotypes. Conclusions The effect of ESS on plaque progression is similar in all phenotypes and cannot be accurately assessed by standalone IVUS-VH which often misclassifies plaque morphology. Therefore, multimodality imaging should be considered to examine the implications of ESS on plaque evolution. Clinical trial registration NCT00962416 ; Post-results.
Christos V. Bourantas, Lorenz Räber, Antonis I. Sakellarios, Yashusi Ueki, Thomas Zanchin, Konstantinos C. Koskinas, Kyohei Yamaji, Masanori Taniwaki, Dik Heg, Maria Radu, Michail I. Papafaklis, Fanis G. Kalatzis, Katerina Κ. Naka, Dimitrios I. Fotiadis, Anthony Mathur, Patrick W. Serruys, Lampros K. Michalis, Héctor M. García‐García, Alexios Karagiannis, Stephan Windecker
Gastón A. Rodríguez-Granillo, Héctor M. García‐García, Marco Valgimigli, Sophia Vaina, Carlos A.G. van Mieghem, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Maarten van der Ent, Evelyn Regar, Peter de Jaegere, Willem van der Giessen, Pim de Feyter, Patrick W. Serruys
Christos V. Bourantas, Thomas Zanchin, Ryo Torii, Patrick W. Serruys, Alexios Karagiannis, Anantharaman Ramasamy, Hannah Safi, Ahmet U. Coskun, Gerhard Koning, Yoshinobu Onuma, Christian Zanchin, Rob Krams, Anthony Mathur, Andreas Baumbach, Gary S. Mintz, Stephan Windecker, Alexandra Lansky, Akiko Maehara, Peter H. Stone, Lorenz Räber, Gregg W. Stone
Christos V. Bourantas, Anantharaman Ramasamy, Alexios Karagiannis, Antonis I. Sakellarios, Thomas Zanchin, Kyohei Yamaji, Yasushi Ueki, Xiaohui Shen, Dimitrios I. Fotiadis, Lampros K. Michalis, Anthony Mathur, Patrick W. Serruys, Héctor M. García‐García, K Koskinas, Ryo Torii, Stephan Windecker, Lorenz Räber
Thadé Goderie, Gijs van Soest, Héctor M. García‐García, Nieves Gonzalo, Senada Koljenović, Geert J.L.H. van Leenders, Frits Mastik, Evelyn Regar, J. Wolter Oosterhuis, Patrick W. Serruys, Antonius F.W. van der Steen
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.