Impact of proton pump inhibitors on efficacy of antiplatelet strategies with ticagrelor or aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the GLOBAL LEADERS trial — Masafumi Ono (2022) | RDL Network
Impact of proton pump inhibitors on efficacy of antiplatelet strategies with ticagrelor or aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the GLOBAL LEADERS trial
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 100(1): 72-82
Article 2022 English
Authors
MO
Masafumi Ono
YO
Yoshinobu Onuma
HK
Hideyuki Kawashima
Abstract
1 min read
Background Several studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may reduce the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and/or aspirin, possibly leading to cardiovascular events. Aims We aimed to investigate the association between PPI and clinical outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor monotherapy or conventional antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This is a subanalysis of the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial, comparing the experimental antiplatelet arm (23‐month ticagrelor monotherapy following 1‐month dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT]) with the reference arm (12‐month aspirin monotherapy following 12‐month DAPT) after PCI. Patient‐oriented composite endpoints (POCEs: all‐cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization) and its components were assessed stratified by PPI use as a time‐dependent covariate in patients with the experiment or reference antiplatelet arm. Results Among 15,839 patients, 2115 patients (13.5%) experienced POCE at 2 years. In the reference arm, the use of PPIs was independently associated with POCE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12–1.44) and its individual components, whereas it was not in the experimental arm (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.92–1.19; p interaction = 0.035). During the second‐year follow‐up, patients taking aspirin with PPIs had a significantly higher risk of POCE compared to those on aspirin without PPIs (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27–1.94), whereas the risk did not differ significantly irrespective of PPI in ticagrelor monotherapy group (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.83–1.28; p interaction = 0.008). Conclusions In contrast to conventional antiplatelet strategy, there were no evidence suggesting the interaction between ticagrelor monotherapy and PPIs on increased cardiovascular events, which should be confirmed in further studies. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov
Rodrigo Modolo, Ply Chichareon, Ana Paula de Faria, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Christian W. Hamm, Pascal Vranckx, Marco Valgimigli, Stephan Windecker, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys, Mariusz Tomaniak, Ply Chichareon, Rodrigo Modolo, Norihiro Kogame, Kuniaki Takahashi, Chun Chin Chang, Ernest Spitzer, Simon Walsh, David Adlam, David Hildick‐Smith, István Édes, Pim van de Harst, Florian Krackhardt, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Tessa Rademaker‐Havinga, Scot Garg, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Christian W. Hamm, Peter Jüni, Pascal Vranckx, Yoshinobu Onuma, Freek W.A. Verheugt
Patrick W. Serruys, Kuniaki Takahashi, Norihiro Kogame, Ply Chichareon, Rodrigo Modolo, Chun Chin Chang, Mariusz Tomaniak, Hidenori Komiyama, Christian W. Hamm, Philippe Gabríel Steg, H P Stoll, Yoshinobu Onuma, Marco Valgimigli, Stephan Windecker, Pascal Vranckx
Kuniaki Takahashi, Ply Chichareon, Chun Chin Chang, Mariusz Tomaniak, Rodrigo Modolo, Norihiro Kogame, H P Stoll, Christian W. Hamm, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Yoshinobu Onuma, Marco Valgimigli, P Vranckx, Stephan Windecker, Didier Carrié, Patrick W. Serruys
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.