Critically ill patients are carefully and closely monitored to assess the nature and severity of their disease process and to assess the need for and impact of different therapies. All organs can be monitored, some more easily than others, with hemodynamic monitoring of the cardiovascular system being the most frequent. Hemodynamic monitoring techniques have progressed immensely since thevery early days of intensive care and perhaps particularly over the past 50 years, moving from the very earliest, bulky sphygmographs to measure arterial pressure, to invasive catheters to assess cardiac output, to the more recent development of noninvasive, digital monitors providing continuous values ofmultiple hemodynamic variables. Concepts have also changed as we move from global macrohemodynamic monitoring toward a more regional, microcirculatory perfusion approach and frommaximal monitoring for all, to a much more individualized approach. Here, we will briefly review these changes.
Michael R. Pinsky, Maurizio Cecconi, Michelle S. Chew, Daniel De Backer, Ivor S. Douglas, Mark Edwards, Olfa Hamzaoui, Glenn Hernández, Greg S. Martin, Xavier Monnet, Bernd Saugel, Thomas Scheeren, Jean–Louis Teboul, Jean Louis Vincent
Alexandre Joosten, Joseph Rinehart, Philippe Van der Linden, Brenton Alexander, Christophe Penna, Jacques de Montblanc, Maxime Cannesson, Jean Louis Vincent, Éric Vicaut, Jacques Duranteau
Jean Louis Vincent, Andrew Rhodes, Azriel Perel, Greg S. Martin, Giorgio Della Rocca, B. Vallet, Michael R. Pinsky, Christoph K. Hofer, Jean–Louis Teboul, Willem P. de Boode, Sabino Scolletta, Antoine Vieillard‐Baron, Daniel De Backer, Keith R. Walley, Marco Maggiorini, Mervyn Singer
Steven M. Hollenberg, Tom S. Ahrens, Djillali Annane, Mark E. Astiz, Donald B. Chalfin, Joseph F. Dasta, Stephen O. Heard, Claude Martin, Lena M. Napolitano, Gregory M. Susla, Richard Totaro, Jean Louis Vincent, S.L. Zanotti-Cavazzoni
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.