Head-to-head comparisons of risk discrimination by questionnaire-based lung cancer risk prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clara Frick; Teresa Seum; Megha Bhardwaj; Tim Holland‐Letz; Ben Schöttker; Hermann Brenner

doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103075

Back

Head-to-head comparisons of risk discrimination by questionnaire-based lung cancer risk prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Article 2025 en

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Article2023

The role of grassland for erosion and flood mitigation in Europe: A meta-analysis

Filippo Milazzo, Richard M. Francksen, Laura Zavattaro, Mohamed Abdalla, Stanislav Hejduk, Simone Ravetto Enri, Marco Pittarello, Paul Newell Price, R.L.M. Schils, Pete Smith, Tom Vanwalleghem

Article2022

Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Risk of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Soo Young Hwang, Jong Yeob Kim, Hye Sun Lee, Sujee Lee, Dayeong Kim, Subin Kim, Jong Hoon Hyun, Jae Il Shin, Kyoung Hwa Lee, Sang Hoon Han, Young Goo Song

Article2012

Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review

George C.M. Siontis, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Konstantinos C. Siontis, John P A Ioannidis

Article2009

Occupational Exposure to Rock Wool and Glass Wool and Risk of Cancers of the Lung and the Head and Neck: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Loren Lipworth, Carlo La Vecchia, Cristina Bosetti, Joseph K. McLaughlin

Article2009

Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cristina Bosetti, Francesca Bravi, Eva Negri, Carlo La Vecchia