Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ekosistem
Uygulama değiştir
EN
Hakkımızda
SSS
Giriş yap
Başla
Fishes learn aversions to a nudibranchs chemical defense — JD Long (2006) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Fishes learn aversions to a nudibranchs chemical defense
Shared by
Mark E Hay
Georgia Institute of Technology
Fishes learn aversions to a nudibranchs chemical defense
Article
2006
en
Authors
JL
JD Long
Mark E Hay
Georgia Institute of Technology
Abstract
2 min read
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 307:199-208 (2006) - doi:10.3354/meps307199 Fishes learn aversions to a nudibranchs chemical defense Jeremy D. Long, Mark E. Hay* School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 310 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0230, USA *Corresponding author. Email: mark.hay@biology.gatech.edu ABSTRACT: The nudibranch Doriopsilla pharpa was rejected as food when tethered in the field and when offered to 2 species of co-occurring crabs (the lesser blue crab Callinectes similus and the mud crab Panopeus herbstii) and 2 species of co-occurring fishes (the mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus and the striped blenny Chasmodes bosquianus) in the laboratory. When the fishes were offered squid-based artificial food containing nudibranch extracts (i.e. defended food), both species initially consumed this food, but rapidly developed aversions in subsequent feedings. Although both fishes rapidly learned to reject the food, they learned using different cues. The striped blenny Chasmodes bosquianus regurgitated following the initial feeding and then avoided all food made of squid regardless of whether or not it contained the extract. In contrast, the mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus did not regurgitate, and learned to avoid only food containing the extract; it still consumed squid-based food without the extract. Thus, the mummichog detected the deterrent chemical and avoided only defended food while the striped blenny was a less effective feeder, avoiding both defended and undefended food that tasted like squid. Bioassay-guided separation using the mummichog demonstrated that the sesquiterpene polygodial was responsible for the deterrent effects of the nudibranch extract. This metabolite also resulted in the striped blenny avoiding either squid- or tuna-based food treated with this metabolite. KEY WORDS: Fish behavior · Predatorprey interactions · Chemical ecology · Oyster reef Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 307. Online publication date: January 24, 2006 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2006 Inter-Research.
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Article
2004
Do brominated natural products defend marine worms from consumers? Some do, most don’t
Cynthia E. Kicklighter
,
Julia Kubanek
,
Mark E Hay
Article
2004
Chemical defense of hydrothermal vent and hydrocarbon seep organisms: a preliminary assessment using shallow-water consumers
Mark E Hay
,
CE Kicklighter
,
Charles R. Fisher
Article
1988
Chemical defense in the seaweed Dictyopteris delicatula: differential effects against reef fishes and amphipods
Mark E Hay
,
J. Emmett Duffy
,
William Fenical
,
Kirk R. Gustafson
Article
1999
Susceptibility of invertebrate larvae to predators:how common are post-capture larval defenses?
SG Bullard
,
NL Lindquist
,
Mark E Hay
Article
2003
Palatability and defense of some tropical infaunal worms: alkylpyrrole sulfamates as deterrents to fish feeding
CE Kicklighter
,
Julia Kubanek
,
Todd Barsby
,
Mark E Hay
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.