Skip to content
RDL
Network
Ekosistem
Uygulama değiştir
EN
Hakkımızda
SSS
Giriş yap
Başla
Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers — Nikolaos A. Trikalinos (2008) | RDL Network
Back
Cite
Save
Save for later
Share
Home
Publications
Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers
Shared by
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers
Article
2008
en
Authors
NT
Nikolaos A. Trikalinos
ΕΕ
Εvangelos Εvangelou
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford University
Discussion
(0)
Sign in
to like and join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Related publications
Article
2012
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by High-Impact Medical Journals in China: A Survey of Instructions for Authors and Published Papers
Xiaoqian Li
,
Kunming Tao
,
Qing-Hui Zhou
,
David Moher
,
Hongyun Chen
,
Fu-zhe Wang
,
Changquan Ling
Article
2002
Varia including papers from the 1998 iip conference the first five papers were originally presented to the iip conference, boston, 1998
Denny Borsboom
,
Gideon J. Mellenbergh
Article
2012
Perceived information gain from randomized trials correlates with publication in high–impact factor journals
Εvangelos Εvangelou
,
Konstantinos Siontis
,
Thomas Pfeiffer
,
John P A Ioannidis
Article
2011
Public Availability of Published Research Data in High-Impact Journals
Alawi Alsheikh‐Ali
,
Waqas Qureshi
,
Mouaz H. Al‐Mallah
,
John P A Ioannidis
Article
2011
From QUOROM to PRISMA: A Survey of High-Impact Medical Journals' Instructions to Authors and a Review of Systematic Reviews in Anesthesia Literature
Kunming Tao
,
Xiaoqian Li
,
Qing-Hui Zhou
,
David Moher
,
Changquan Ling
,
Weifeng Yu
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.