Factors associated with population coverage of targeted malaria elimination (TME) in southern Savannakhet Province, Lao PDR
Malaria Journal 16(1)
Article 2017 English
Authors
BA
Bipin Adhikari
KP
Koukeo Phommasone
TP
Tiengkham Pongvongsa
Abstract
2 min read
Targeted malaria elimination (TME) in Lao PDR (Laos) included three rounds of mass drug administrations (MDA) against malaria followed by quarterly blood surveys in two villages in Nong District at Savannakhet Province. The success of MDA largely depends upon the efficacy of the anti-malarial drug regimen, local malaria epidemiology and the population coverage. In order to explore the reasons for participation in TME, a quantitative survey was conducted after the completion of the three rounds of MDA. The survey was conducted in two villages with a total of 158 households in July and August 2016. Among the 973 villagers eligible for participation in the MDA, 158 (16.2%) adults (> 18 years) were selected, one each from every household for the interviews using a quantitative questionnaire. 150/158 (94.9%) respondents participated at least in one activity (taking medicine or testing their blood) of TME. 141/150 (94.0%) respondents took part in the MDA and tested their blood in all three rounds. 17/158 (10.7%) were partial or non-participants in three rounds of MDA. Characteristics of respondents which were independently associated with completion of three rounds of MDA included: attending TME meetings [AOR = 12.0 (95% CI 1.1–20.5) (p = 0.03)], knowing that malaria can be diagnosed through blood tests [AOR = 5.6 (95% CI 1.0–32.3) (p = 0.05)], all members from household participated [AOR = 4.2 (95% CI 1.3–14.0) (p = 0.02)], liking all aspects of TME [AOR = 17.2 (95% CI 1.6–177.9) (p = 0.02)] and the perception that TME was important [AOR = 14.9 (95% CI 1.3–171.2) (p = 0.03)]. Complete participation in TME was significantly associated with participation in community engagement activities, knowledge that the blood tests were for malaria diagnosis, family members' participation at TME and perceptions that TME was worthwhile. A responsive approach to community engagement that includes formative research and the involvement of community members may increase the uptake of the intervention.
Bipin Adhikari, Koukeo Phommasone, Palingnaphone Kommarasy, Xayaphone Soundala, Phonesavanh Souvanthong, Tiengkham Pongvongsa, Gisela Henriques, Paul N. Newton, Sir Nicholas White, Nicholas Day, Arjen M. Dondorp, Lorenz von Seidlein, Mayfong Mayxay, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Christopher Pell
Bipin Adhikari, Koukeo Phommasone, Tiengkham Pongvongsa, Xayaphone Soundala, Palingnaphone Koummarasy, Gisela Henriques, Thomas J. Peto, Lorenz von Seidlein, Sir Nicholas White, Nicholas Day, Arjen M. Dondorp, Paul N. Newton, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Mayfong Mayxay, Christopher Pell
Koukeo Phommasone, Bipin Adhikari, Gisela Henriques, Tiengkham Pongvongsa, Panom Phongmany, Lorenz von Seidlein, Sir Nicholas White, Nicholas Day, Arjen M. Dondorp, Paul N. Newton, Mallika Imwong, Mayfong Mayxay
Lorenz von Seidlein, Thomas J. Peto, Jordi Landier, Thuy-Nhien Nguyen, Rupam Tripura, Koukeo Phommasone, Tiengkham Pongvongsa, Khin Maung Lwin, Lilly Keereecharoen, Ladda Kajeechiwa, May Myo Thwin, Daniel M. Parker, Jacher Wiladphaingern, Suphak Nosten, Stéphane Proux, Vincent Corbel, Tuong-Vy Nguyen, Truong Le Phuc Nhi, Do Hung Son, Pham Nguyen Huong-Thu, Nguyen Thi Kim Tuyen, Nguyen T. Tien, Le Thanh Dong,
Bipin Adhikari, Koukeo Phommasone, Tiengkham Pongvongsa, Palingnaphone Koummarasy, Xayaphone Soundala, Gisela Henriques, Pasathorn Sirithiranont, Daniel M. Parker, Lorenz von Seidlein, Sir Nicholas White, Nicholas Day, Arjen M. Dondorp, Paul N. Newton, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Christopher Pell, Mayfong Mayxay
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.