Exploring Possible Drug-Resistant Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (M<sup>pro</sup>) with Noncovalent Preclinical Candidate, Mpro61 — Jessica R. Kenneson (2025) | RDL Network
Exploring Possible Drug-Resistant Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (M<sup>pro</sup>) with Noncovalent Preclinical Candidate, Mpro61
ACS Bio & Med Chem Au
Article 2025 English
Authors
JK
Jessica R. Kenneson
CP
Christina Papini
ST
Su Tang
Abstract
1 min read
SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors, such as nirmatrelvir, have proven efficacy in clinical use. Nirmatrelvir was developed in a target-based approach against wild-type Mpro, with the anticipation that prolonged usage may cause enrichment of drug-resistant mutations and persistence of COVID infections. Although globally prevalent drug-resistant mutations have not yet been observed, individual cases have recently been reported among patients following treatment with Paxlovid-a formulation of nirmatrelvir. Mutations E166V and E166A have been detected in these drug-resistant clinical isolates, consistent with predictions from in vitro viral passage experiments and therefore necessitate ongoing drug development. In this study, we selected seven Mpro variants (T21I, L50F, E166V, A173V, T190I, E166V/L50F, and A173V/L50F), which have been repeatedly found in viral passage experiments. We investigated their kinetic and structural properties, as well as resistance level to Mpro inhibitors: nirmatrelvir, GC376-a similar peptidomimetic for feline COVID infections, and our in-house-developed nonpeptidomimetic inhibitor Mpro61. Mpro61 maintains potency against the single variants (except for E166V) and the A173/L50F double variant, with K i values similar to those of the wild type. In contrast, while nirmatrelvir and GC376 were still effective against the A173V/L50F double variant, their K i values significantly increased up to 10-fold. None of the inhibitors appeared to be potent against E166V-containing variants. Our structural analysis revealed a significant movement of Ser1 residue in all E166V-containing variants in the presence or absence of an inhibitor. The new orientation of the Ser1 suggested potential strategies for medicinal chemistry modifications of Mpro61 to enhance hydrogen-bonding interactions between these variants and Mpro61 derivatives. These studies provide critical insights into guiding the future design of additional Mpro61 derivatives that would potentially inhibit variants with the pan-drug-resistant E166V mutation.
Patrick J. Moon, Lydia Boike, Dustin Dovala, Nathaniel J. Henning, Mark Knapp, Jessica N. Spradlin, Carl C. Ward, Helene Wolleb, Charlotte M. Zammit, Daniel Fuller, Gabrielle Blake, Jason Murphy, Feng Wang, Yipin Lu, Stephanie Moquin, Laura Tandeske, Matthew J. Hesse, Jeffrey M. McKenna, John A. Tallarico, Markus Schirle, Dean Toste, Daniel K. Nomura
Patrick J. Moon, Charlotte M. Zammit, Qian Shao, Dustin Dovala, Lydia Boike, Nathaniel J. Henning, Mark Knapp, Jessica N. Spradlin, Carl C. Ward, Helene Wolleb, Daniel Fuller, Gabrielle Blake, Jason Murphy, Feng Wang, Yipin Lu, Stephanie Moquin, Laura Tandeske, Matthew J. Hesse, Jeffrey M. McKenna, John A. Tallarico, Markus Schirle, Dean Toste, Daniel K. Nomura
Chunhui Zhang, Elizabeth A. Stone, M.G. Deshmukh, Joseph A. Ippolito, Mohammad Mehdi Ghahremanpour, Julian Tirado‐Rives, Krasimir A. Spasov, Shuo Zhang, Yuka Takeo, Shalley N. Kudalkar, Zhuobin Liang, Farren J. Isaacs, Brett D. Lindenbach, Scott J. Miller, Karen S. Anderson, William L. Jorgensen
Kamrul Hasan Chowdhury, Md. Riad Chowdhury, Shafi Mahmud, Abu Montakim Tareq, Nujhat Binte Hanif, Naureen Banu, A.S.M. Ali Reza, Talha Bin Emran, Jesus Simal Gandara
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.