Evaluation of ground motion models for USGS seismic hazard models using near-source instrumental recordings of the Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence

D. E. McNamara; Emily Wolin; John Rekoske; Eric M Thompson; Peter M. Powers; Morgan P. Moschetti; Mark D. Petersen; H. Benz; David C. Wilson

Evaluation of ground motion models for USGS seismic hazard models using near-source instrumental recordings of the Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence

AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts 2019

Article 2019 English

Related publications

Article2020

Evaluation of Ground-Motion Models for USGS Seismic Hazard Models Using Near-Source Instrumental Ground-Motion Recordings of the Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence

Daniel E. McNamara, Emily Wolin, Morgan P. Moschetti, Eric M Thompson, Peter M. Powers, Alison M. Shumway, Mark D. Petersen, David C. Wilson, H. Benz

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Article2019

Evaluation of Ground‐Motion Models for U.S. Geological Survey Seismic Hazard Models: 2018 Anchorage, Alaska, Mw 7.1 Subduction Zone Earthquake Sequence

Daniel E. McNamara, Emily Wolin, Peter M. Powers, Alison M. Shumway, Morgan P. Moschetti, John Rekoske, Eric M Thompson, Charles S. Mueller, Mark D. Petersen

Seismological Research Letters

Article2019

Source, site and path characterization of the July 2019 M7.1 and M6.4 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence

A. Baltay, Grace A. Parker, Eric M Thompson, John Rekoske, D. E. McNamara

AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts

Article2018

Evaluation of Ground‐Motion Models for USGS Seismic Hazard Forecasts: Induced and Tectonic Earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States

Daniel E. McNamara, Mark D. Petersen, Eric M Thompson, Peter M. Powers, Allison M. Shumway, Susan M. Hoover, Morgan P. Moschetti, Emily Wolin

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Article2020

Near-Field Ground Motions and Shaking from the 2019 Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest, California, Mainshock: Insights from Instrumental, Macroseismic Intensity, and Remote-Sensing Data

S. E. Hough, Sang‐Ho Yun, Jungkyo Jung, Eric M Thompson, Grace A. Parker, Oliver L. Stephenson

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Evaluation of ground motion models for USGS seismic hazard models using near-source instrumental recordings of the Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence

Abstract

Discussion(0)

Related publications

Evaluation of Ground-Motion Models for USGS Seismic Hazard Models Using Near-Source Instrumental Ground-Motion Recordings of the Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence

Evaluation of Ground‐Motion Models for U.S. Geological Survey Seismic Hazard Models: 2018 Anchorage, Alaska, Mw 7.1 Subduction Zone Earthquake Sequence

Source, site and path characterization of the July 2019 M7.1 and M6.4 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence

Evaluation of Ground‐Motion Models for USGS Seismic Hazard Forecasts: Induced and Tectonic Earthquakes in the Central and Eastern United States

Near-Field Ground Motions and Shaking from the 2019 Mw 7.1 Ridgecrest, California, Mainshock: Insights from Instrumental, Macroseismic Intensity, and Remote-Sensing Data