Ethics roundtable debate: child with severe brain damage and an underlying brain tumour.
Article 2004 en
Authors
SG
Scott R. Gunn
SH
Satoru Hashimoto
MK
Michael Karakozov
Abstract
1 min read
A young person presents with a highly malignant brain tumour with hemiparesis and limited prognosis after resection. She then suffers an iatrogenic cardiac and respiratory arrest that results in profound anoxic encephalopathy. A difference in opinion between the treatment team and the parent is based on a question of futile therapy. Opinions from five intensivists from around the world explore the differences in ethical and legal issues. A Physician-ethicist comments on the various approaches.
Jean Louis Vincent, Christian Brun‐Buisson, Michael S. Niederman, Christian Haenni, Stephan Harbarth, Dominique Sprumont, Mauricio Valencia, Antoni Torres
Isabelle M. Medana, Ralf-Björn Lindert, Ulrich Wurster, Tran Tinh Hien, Nicholas P. J. Day, Nguyen Hoan Phu, Nguyen Thi Hoang, Ly Van Chuong, Tran Thi Hong Chau, Gareth D. H. Turner, Jeremy Farrar, Sir Nicholas White
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.