Estimating the probable cause of recurrence in Plasmodium vivax malaria: relapse, reinfection or recrudescence?

Background: Relapse of Plasmodium vivax infection is the main cause of vivax malaria in many parts of Asia. However at the individual patient level, recurrence of a blood stage infection following treatment within the endemic area can be either a relapse (from dormant liver-stage parasites), a recrudescence (blood-stage treatment failure), or a reinfection (following a new mosquito inoculation). Each requires a different prevention strategy, but previously they could not be distinguished reliably. Time-of-event and genetic data provide complimentary information about the cause of P. vivax recurrence, but the optimum approach to genotyping and analysis remains uncertain. Methods: Individual-level data from two large drug trials in acute vivax malaria patients (Vivax History: VHX; Best Primaquine Dose: BPD) conducted on the Thailand-Myanmar border with follow-up of one year were pooled (n=1299). A total of 710 isolates from both acute and recurrent P. vivax episodes were genotyped using 3-9 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers. These pooled data were analyzed using a novel population statistical model incorporating an assessment of genetic relatedness, treatment drug administered, and the time-to-recurrence. Results: 99% of genotyped recurrences in individuals who did not receive primaquine (n=365) were estimated to be relapses. In comparison, 14% of genotyped recurrences (n=121) were estimated to be relapses following high-dose supervised primaquine. By comparing episodes across individuals (90194 comparisons), the false-positive rate of relapse identification using genetic data alone was estimated to be 2.2%. We estimated the true failure rate after high-dose primaquine (7mg/kg total dose) to be 2.6% in this epidemiological context, substantially lower the reinfection unadjusted estimate of 12%. Simulation studies show that 9 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers suffice to discriminate between recurrence states. Drug exposures reflected by plasma carboxy-primaquine concentrations were not predictive of treatment failure, but did identify non-adherence. Conclusion: Using this novel statistical model, relapse of P. vivax malaria could be distinguished reliably from reinfection. This showed that in this population supervised high-dose primaquine could avert up to 99% of relapses. In low transmission settings, microsatellite genotyping combined with time-to event data can accurately discriminate between the different causes of recurrent P. vivax malaria.