Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Monotherapy by Clinical Presentation: Pre‐Specified Analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS Trial — Pascal Vranckx (2021) | RDL Network
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Monotherapy by Clinical Presentation: Pre‐Specified Analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS Trial
Journal of the American Heart Association 10(18)
Article 2021 English
Authors
PV
Pascal Vranckx
MV
Marco Valgimigli
AO
Ayodele Odutayo
Abstract
1 min read
Background The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary drug-eluting stent placement in adults with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) versus acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains uncertain. Methods and Results This was a prespecified subgroup analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the experimental or reference strategy, stratified by ACS (experimental, n=3750; reference, n=3737) versus SCAD (experimental, n=4230; reference, n=4251). The experimental strategy was 75 to 100 mg aspirin daily plus 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily for 1 month, followed by 23 months of ticagrelor monotherapy. The reference strategy was 75 to 100 mg aspirin daily plus either 75 mg clopidogrel daily (for SCAD) or 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily (for ACS) for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months. The primary end point at 2 years was a composite of all-cause mortality or non-fatal centrally adjudicated new Q-wave myocardial infarction. The key secondary safety end point was site-reported Bleeding Academic Research Consortium grade 3 or 5 bleeding. The primary end point occurred in 147 (3.92%) versus 169 (4.52%) patients with ACS (rate ratio [RR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.69-1.08; P=0.189), and in 157 (3.71%) versus 180 (4.23%) patients with SCAD (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08; P=0.221) with experimental and reference strategy, respectively (P-interaction=0.926). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium grade 3 or 5 bleeding occurred in 73 (1.95%) versus 100 (2.68%) patients with ACS (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.98; P=0.037), and in 90 (2.13%) versus 69 (1.62%) patients with SCAD (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.97-1.81; P=0.081; P-interaction=0.007). Conclusions While there was no evidence for differences in efficacy between treatment strategies by subgroup, the experimental strategy appeared to reduce bleeding risk in patients with ACS but not in patients with SCAD. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01813435.
Mariusz Tomaniak, Ply Chichareon, Rodrigo Modolo, Kuniaki Takahashi, Chun Chin Chang, Norihiro Kogame, Ernest Spitzer, Paweł Buszman, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Veselin Valkov, Clemens Steinwender, Tobias Geisler, Janusz Prokopczuk, Manel Sabaté, Krzysztof Żmudka, Tessa Rademaker‐Havinga, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Peter Jüni, Christian W. Hamm, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Yoshinobu Onuma, Pascal Vranckx, Marco Valgimigli, Stephan Windecker, Usman Baber, Richard Anderson, Marcello Dominici, Patrick W. Serruys
Chao Gao, Mariusz Tomaniak, Kuniaki Takahashi, Hideyuki Kawashima, Rutao Wang, Hironori Hara, Masafumi Ono, Gilles Montalescot, Scot Garg, Michael Haude, Ton Slagboom, Pascal Vranckx, Marco Valgimigli, Stephan Windecker, Robert-Jan van Geuns, Christian Hamm, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Yoshinobu Onuma, Dominick J. Angiolillo, Patrick W. Serruys
Mariusz Tomaniak, Ply Chichareon, Rodrigo Modolo, Paweł Buszman, Manel Sabaté, Tobias Geisler, Christian W. Hamm, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Yoshinobu Onuma, P Vranckx, Marco Valgimigli, Stephan Windecker, Richard Anderson, Marcello Dominici, Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys, Mariusz Tomaniak, Ply Chichareon, Rodrigo Modolo, Norihiro Kogame, Kuniaki Takahashi, Chun Chin Chang, Ernest Spitzer, Simon Walsh, David Adlam, David Hildick‐Smith, István Édes, Pim van de Harst, Florian Krackhardt, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Tessa Rademaker‐Havinga, Scot Garg, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Christian W. Hamm, Peter Jüni,
Kuniaki Takahashi, Ply Chichareon, Chun Chin Chang, Mariusz Tomaniak, Rodrigo Modolo, Norihiro Kogame, H P Stoll, Christian W. Hamm, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Yoshinobu Onuma, Marco Valgimigli, P Vranckx, Stephan Windecker, Didier Carrié, Patrick W. Serruys
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.