Using Titania type electrodes that are liable to develop fisheyes in the deposit metal, depending upon the test method adopted, two kinds of specimens were prepared : one as weld and the other subjected to a hydrogen-removing treatment (250°C, 8h). They were put to a fatigue test on the Ono's Repeated Bending Fatigue Testing Machine, with the following results :1) In the former specimen, fatigue cracks originate from micro-blowholes lying somewhat deep under the surface; while in the latter, they do so from micro-blowholes very close to the surface. These micro-blowholes correspond to the nuclei of fisheyes appearing in tension test pieces.2) In the former, nominal stress, namely, fatigue limit with no consideration made for the locations of these micro-blowholes, is about 2-3kg/mm2 lower than in the latter (Fig.3). When, however, the crack-developing stress is considered, the difference well be about 10kg/mm2 (Fig. 5) ; this is presumably due to the variance of hydrogen content between the two.
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.