Discordance Between Ldl Cholesterol Versus Particle Concentration And The Cardiovascular Risk Factor Profile — Jonathan J. Ruiz‐Ramie (2020) | RDL Network
Discordance Between Ldl Cholesterol Versus Particle Concentration And The Cardiovascular Risk Factor Profile
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 52(7S): 421-422
Article 2020 English
Authors
JR
Jonathan J. Ruiz‐Ramie
AL
Abbi D. Lane‐Cordova
JW
John T. Wilkins
Abstract
1 min read
Although low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels have been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, subjects with well controlled LDL-C are still at considerable residual risk for CVD. Alternative measures such as particle concentration of LDL (LDL-P) may be clinically useful for fully characterizing LDL associated risk. PURPOSE: To compare CVD risk factor profiles among groups of people with discordant levels of LDL-C versus LDL-P concentration in the HERITAGE Family Study. METHODS: Standard lipid panels and lipoprotein subclass profiles via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy were measured among 715 participants (34% Black, 55% Female). LDL-C and LDL-P values ≥ the median value were considered high and values < median were considered low. Four exclusive LDL-C/LDL-P groups were identified for LDL from these base categories: 1) low/low (< median for both LDL-C and LDL-P), 2) low/high (< median for LDL-C, ≥ median for LDL-P), 3) high/low, and 4) high/high. Cross-sectional associations between baseline LDL discordance group and CVD risk factors were assessed via multivariable linear regression. All models were adjusted for age, race, and sex. RESULTS: Sixty four (9.0%) participants were discordant with high LDL-C/low LDL-P, while 61 (8.5%) were discordant with low LDL-C/high LDL-P. Both concordant groups (low LDL-C/low LDL-P, high LDL-C/high LDL-P) were composed of 295 participants each (41.3%). Main effects (p<0.05) of LDL discordant group were found for the following outcomes: triglycerides, HDL-C, HDL-P size and small and large HDL-P concentration, percent body fat, maximal oxygen uptake, fasting insulin, lipoprotein lipase activity, testosterone, GlycA, and C-reactive protein. In general, groups with lower LDL-P had more favorable CVD risk factor profiles relative to high LDL-P groups. CONCLUSIONS: In general, low LDL-P levels were associated with favorable CVD risk factor profiles regardless of LDL-C levels.
Dorina Ibi, Lisanne L. Blauw, Raymond Noordam, Martijn E.T. Dollé, J. Wouter Jukema, Frits R. Rosendaal, Constantinos Christodoulides, Matt J. Neville, Robert W. Koivula, Patrick C.N. Rensen, Fredrik Karpe, Ko Willems van Dijk
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.