Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus chloroquine to treat vivax malaria in Afghanistan: an open randomized, non-inferiority, trial — Ghulam Rahim Awab (2010) | RDL Network
Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus chloroquine to treat vivax malaria in Afghanistan: an open randomized, non-inferiority, trial
Malaria Journal 9(1)
Article 2010 English
Authors
GA
Ghulam Rahim Awab
SP
Sasithon Pukrittayakamee
MI
Mallika Imwong
Abstract
2 min read
Background Afghanistan's national guidelines recommend chloroquine for the treatment of Plasmodium vivax infection, the parasite responsible for the majority of its malaria burden. Chloroquine resistance in P. vivax is emerging in Asia. Therapeutic responses across Afghanistan have not been evaluated in detail. Methods Between July 2007 and February 2009, an open-label, randomized controlled trial of chloroquine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in patients aged three months and over with slide-confirmed P. vivax mono-infections was conducted. Consistent with current national guidelines, primaquine was not administered. Subjects were followed up daily during the acute phase of illness (days 0-3) and weekly until day 56. The primary endpoint was the overall cumulative parasitological failure rate at day 56 after the start of treatment, with the hypothesis being that dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was non-inferior compared to chloroquine (Δ = 5% difference in proportion of failures). Results Of 2,182 individuals with positive blood films for P. vivax , 536 were enrolled in the trial. The day 28 cure rate was 100% in both treatment groups. Parasite clearance was more rapid with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine than chloroquine. At day 56, there were more recurrent infections in the chloroquine arm (8.9%, 95% CI 6.0-13.1%) than the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine arm (2.8%, 95% CI 1.4-5.8%), a difference in cumulative recurrence rate of 6.1% (2-sided 90%CI +2.6 to +9.7%). The log-rank test comparing the survival curves confirmed the superiority of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine over chloroquine (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that a lower initial haemoglobin concentration was also independently associated with recurrence. Both regimens were well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions Chloroquine remains an efficacious treatment for the treatment of vivax malaria in Afghanistan. In a setting where radical therapy cannot be administered, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine provides additional benefit in terms of post-treatment prophylaxis, reducing the incidence of recurrence from 4-8 weeks after treatment. Trial Registration The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00682578.
Ghulam Rahim Awab, Sasithon Pukrittayakamee, Mallika Imwong, Arjen M. Dondorp, Charles J. Woodrow, Sue Jean Lee, Nicholas Day, Pratap Singhasivanon, Sir Nicholas White, Faizullah Kaker
Aung Pyae Phyo, Khin Maung Lwin, Ric N. Price, Elizabeth A. Ashley, Bruce Russell, Kanlaya Sriprawat, Niklas Lindegårdh, Pratap Singhasivanon, Sir Nicholas White, François Nosten
Phung Duc Thuan, Nguyen Thuy Nha Ca, Pham Van Toi, Thuy-Nhien Nguyen, Ngo Viet Thanh, Nguyen Duc Anh, Nguyen Hoan Phu, Cao Quang Thai, Le Hong Thai, Nhu Thi Hoa, Le Thanh Dong, Mai Anh Loi, Do Hung Son, Tran Tinh Ngoc Khanh, Christiane Dolecek, Ho Thi Nhan, Marcel Wolbers, Guy Thwaites, Jeremy Farrar, Sir Nicholas White, Tran Tinh Hien
Cindy S. Chu, Aung Pyae Phyo, Claudia Turner, Htun Htun Win, Naw Pet Poe, Widi Yotyingaphiram, Suradet Thinraow, Pornpimon Wilairisak, Rattanaporn Raksapraidee, Verena I. Carrara, Moo Kho Paw, Jacher Wiladphaingern, Stéphane Proux, Germana Bancone, Kanlaya Sriprawat, Sue J. Lee, Atthanee Jeeyapant, James A Watson, Joel Tärning, Mallika Imwong, François Nosten, Sir Nicholas White
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.