Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions were often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis

Matthew J. Page; Phi‐Yen Nguyen; Daniel G. Hamilton; Neal Haddaway; Raju Kanukula; David Moher; Joanne E. McKenzie

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.003

Back

Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions were often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis

Article 2022 en

Discussion(0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Related publications

Preprint2021

Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions were often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis

Matthew J. Page, Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Daniel G. Hamilton, Neal Haddaway, Raju Kanukula, David Moher, Joanne E. McKenzie

Article2017

Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis

Matthew J. Page, Douglas G. Altman, Joanne E. McKenzie, Larissa Shamseer, Nadera Ahmadzai, Dianna Wolfe, Fatemeh Yazdi, Ferrán Catalá-López, Andrea C. Tricco, David Moher

Preprint2023

Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews

Emmanuel A. Zavalis, Anaïs Rameau, Anirudh Saraswathula, Joachim Vist, Ewoud Schuit, John P A Ioannidis

Article2024

Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Emmanuel A. Zavalis, Anaïs Rameau, Anirudh Saraswathula, Joachim Vist, Ewoud Schuit, John P A Ioannidis

Article2012

Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses?

Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis