Coverage and system efficiencies of insecticide-treated nets in Africa from 2000 to 2017
Article 2015 en
Authors
SB
Samir Bhatt
DW
Daniel J. Weiss
BM
Bonnie Mappin
Abstract
1 min read
Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) for malaria control are widespread but coverage remains inadequate. We developed a Bayesian model using data from 102 national surveys, triangulated against delivery data and distribution reports, to generate year-by-year estimates of four ITN coverage indicators. We explored the impact of two potential 'inefficiencies': uneven net distribution among households and rapid rates of net loss from households. We estimated that, in 2013, 21% (17%–26%) of ITNs were over-allocated and this has worsened over time as overall net provision has increased. We estimated that rates of ITN loss from households are more rapid than previously thought, with 50% lost after 23 (20–28) months. We predict that the current estimate of 920 million additional ITNs required to achieve universal coverage would in reality yield a lower level of coverage (77% population access). By improving efficiency, however, the 920 million ITNs could yield population access as high as 95%.
Samir Bhatt, Daniel J. Weiss, Bonnie Mappin, Ursula Dalrymple, Ewan Cameron, Donal Bisanzio, David L. Smith, Catherine L. Moyes, Andrew J. Tatem, Michael E Lynch, Cristin Fergus, Joshua Yukich, Adam Bennett, Thomas P. Eisele, Jan Kolaczinski, Richard Cibulskis, Simon I Hay, Peter W. Gething
Frank Smithuis, Moe Kyaw Kyaw, U Ohn Phe, Ingrid van der Broek, Nina Katterman, Colin Rogers, Patrick Almeida, Piet A. Kager, Kasia Stepniewska, Yoel Lubell, J. A. Simpson, Sir Nicholas White
Richard J. Maude, Chea Nguon, Po Ly, Bunkea Tol, Pengby Ngor, Sara E. Canavati de la Torre, Sir Nicholas White, Arjen M. Dondorp, Nicholas Day, Lisa J. White, Char Meng Chuor
Discussion(0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.